Jump to content

Recommended Posts

From the London Roadworks register:



View on map LR00465000827 Forest Hill Road, London. FOREST HILL ROAD BETWEEEN MARMORA ROAD AND BRENCHLEY GARDENS. Works Proposed Southwark

020 7525 2000

Web Site

Southwark MODIFICATION TO EXISTING SIGNALS AND ROAD LAYOUT TO IMPROVE ROAD SAFETY. INTRODUCTION OF CENTRAL RES ... 01/07/2013

to

30/09/2013


The council consulted on these plans about six months ago. Mostly for safety reasons after a couple of high speed, late night crashes. Some of the planned changes seemed good to me but others pretty superfluous. Can't believe it's scheduled for 3 months though!

There has just been what looks like a serious accident at the junction of Brenchley Gardens and Forest Hill Road. The road is closed off and a number of fire engines are in attendance. Seems as if the proposed work to improve road safety is long overdue.

Thanks sheilarose - when I responded to the consultation, that's exactly the junction that I felt needed a really good look at. I find it terrifying the way some people pull out and the speeds they go and I'm a fairly confident driver.


In contrast, the Wood Vale/Forest Hill road junction has lights and space for pedestrians to cross, so didn't see why it was planned to be redone at all.


LwL, I might have posted a link at the time, will see if I can find it.


Edited for spelling!

Here you go, think the link in my post is still live.


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,851361,852013#msg-852013


I only found out about it from walking past the consultation posters, even though I live nearby. It looks like the whole thing is going ahead without any amendment, so guessing either not many other people responded or the vast majority were in favour of the whole program.

This is a very long time coming. I grew up on the Forest Hill Road junction with Brenchley Gardens and it's been a blackspot for as long as I can remember, my Mum showed me the plans the other day and it all looks pretty sensible, It will be worth 3 months of being put out if it stops so many accidents.

Vik, the plans that Siduhe found don't seem to address any of the problems with the Brenchley Gardens junction, as far as I can see. In fact, they look like narrowing that junction so the queues would just get longer and drivers more frustrated as cars waiting to turn right would hold up all the traffic wanting to turn left out of Brenchley. And there is nothing suggested for Canonbie Road just opposite, which is a very difficult turn if you want to go across to Brenchley or vice versa. I prefer not to do it and use Netherby road instead (if its not school pick up/drop off time, which is another law unto itself).


I guess that the Canonbie/Brenchley junction issue isn't addressed because that crosses the boundary between Southwark and Lewisham - and of course there's no way they could work together! :)

Siduhe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> In contrast, the Wood Vale/Forest Hill road

> junction has lights and space for pedestrians to

> cross, so didn't see why it was planned to be

> redone at all.

>


If you are crossing Wood Vale as a pedestrian going downhill (west), it's a bit crap because you can't see traffic behind you turning left into Wood Vale, and you can't really tell when traffic on Wood Vale will get moving with the green light. Hopefully there will be a green/red man, and the traffic lights on Wood Vale more visible to somebody standing on the corner.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm not convinced that BoE calculator tackles house prices. I think it's only goods and services - e.g. I think 465k in 1997 would buy you the same amount of bananas as £929k would now. but it can't include house prices. Or bitcoins or shares or other investments.
    • It's really not that complex.  There are some long standing Green Party supporters whose primary concern is the environment (who deplore hatred).  There are some left leaning centrists who are disappointed with the Labour party's performance in government who are looking for an alternative socialist party to vote for.  And there are some rabid antisemites who used to get away with that in Labour but found themselves homeless after the EHCR decided  Labour was guilty of unlawful discrimination. It's pretty simple actually.
    • It's not taxes on motoring. It's taxes on value.  The problem for you, and for the government, is that those taxes increase the cost of living exponentially. It doesn't matter whether you buy fuel or not. Everything else you buy relies on someone else who does buy fuel. I'm amazed you can't see that. 
    • Nope, it was because she thought people who owned houses were good Tories.  Yes, she didn't want workers being represented by workers.  She believed that the individual should take responsibility for their own pay and conditions, whether that was possible or not. I'll talk more about the lessons of Thatcher another time, one of my faves is energy policy (ie let's use much of our North Sea gas to generated electricity rather than save some for future generations....) From AI (a longer piece on objectives, pros and cons so there is some sort of balance)  Ideological Transformation & Voting Patterns: By turning working-class, often Labour-voting council tenants into homeowners, she sought to shift their political loyalty to the Conservative party, which she believed was rewarded.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...