Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Any ideas about how to keep intact and operational the platform swing for wheelchair users adjacent to the children's playground in Dulwich Park? It's been vandalised AGAIN and there may be a limit as to how many times the council/Friends will fix it. It's a FANTASTIC resource for entertainment and therapy for a few people I know and we haven't found anything similar for miles and miles around. Is the answer not to lock it - this means that 'bona fide' users would have to buy and bring special retaining straps with them so not ideal? I suspect the lock is broken and then bits stolen because people cannot use the swing without a Radar key but feel the need to get on it and use it 'because it's there'.


This is a plea for this lovely swing to be repaired for a second/third/fourth time - but with all the cuts to frontline services everywhere, we know it might not be a priority as it's for the use of a small minority. Not all wheelchair-using adults and children would want to swing on it (not everyone likes to swing when they grow up, after all) but for those who can and do, the experience is priceless.


On a different note, the wheelchair-accessible children's roundabout is getting difficult to push - I think the bearings may be worn so that is a different issue entirely... :-)

one way is for us all to 'remind' non wheelchair users that this swing is not intended for them. I pointed this out to a teacher who was with a number if students on a trip to the park who were using the swing (maybe 8 -10 kids at once). she was a bit Embarrassedi guess but not nearly as much as she should have been!
There's no excuse for damaging it, or using the clamps which need a Radar type key to access if you don't need them (eg aren't using it with a wheelchair), but as macutd said pretty sure there is no sign saying it can't be used by anyone just as a swing - happy to be corrected...

Hi, I'm the OP. The platform swing is fenced off as a deterrent to non-wheelchair users. The wheelchair mobility/disability symbol is a feature of the fence design.


The design of the platform itself will not allow it to be used without a Radar key since there is a heavy-duty lock underneath the platform attaching it to the ground, preventing it from moving unless one uses a Radar key to unlock it. The removable straps that clip a wheelchair frame to the platform are cached underneath in a recess secured with the same lock.


It is this lock that has been broken twice - it would take serious intent to do so - and the last time, the bar that holds wheelchairs in place when the platform is swinging was broken too - this was wanton damage as it would not prevent anybody from using the swing. An attempt has been made to fix the broken bar but it is a poor job.


The reason why I wrote was because I imagine anyone can damage anything if he/she/they really want(s) to. I wondered whether people who know the platform swing - that has "disability" symbols all over it - thought that if it were made accessible to all i.e. had the lock removed so that it could move freely, it would then lose the only 'cool' thing about it which is that it is "prohibited" - so people would stop trying to get at it.


Actually now I think about it, the reason why it is fenced off is that this very heavy platform swinging would be a major safety hazard to passersby especially children were it not secured. To use it, one has to open a gate bolted from inside (so that short children cannot reach it), go into the enclosure, bolt the gate behind one... and then go through the procedures required to use it safely.


So the question has to be, probably, how to deter vandals from damaging it. This equipment, I now realise, HAS to be used in a controlled environment or it could do serious damage to other people. The wheelchair user him/herself requires adult assistance to access it.


It's a great piece of equipment, well designed for wheelchair users to use safely - but a real hazard in uncontrolled 'general' use. Maybe a sign to say "This is great kit if you are a wheelchair user. It is locked to keep others safe. Please respect this and do not cause damage as then wheelchair users cannot use the platform. Thank you."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm not convinced that BoE calculator tackles house prices. I think it's only goods and services - e.g. I think 465k in 1997 would buy you the same amount of bananas as £929k would now. but it can't include house prices. Or bitcoins or shares or other investments.
    • It's really not that complex.  There are some long standing Green Party supporters whose primary concern is the environment (who deplore hatred).  There are some left leaning centrists who are disappointed with the Labour party's performance in government who are looking for an alternative socialist party to vote for.  And there are some rabid antisemites who used to get away with that in Labour but found themselves homeless after the EHCR decided  Labour was guilty of unlawful discrimination. It's pretty simple actually.
    • It's not taxes on motoring. It's taxes on value.  The problem for you, and for the government, is that those taxes increase the cost of living exponentially. It doesn't matter whether you buy fuel or not. Everything else you buy relies on someone else who does buy fuel. I'm amazed you can't see that. 
    • Nope, it was because she thought people who owned houses were good Tories.  Yes, she didn't want workers being represented by workers.  She believed that the individual should take responsibility for their own pay and conditions, whether that was possible or not. I'll talk more about the lessons of Thatcher another time, one of my faves is energy policy (ie let's use much of our North Sea gas to generated electricity rather than save some for future generations....) From AI (a longer piece on objectives, pros and cons so there is some sort of balance)  Ideological Transformation & Voting Patterns: By turning working-class, often Labour-voting council tenants into homeowners, she sought to shift their political loyalty to the Conservative party, which she believed was rewarded.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...