Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Townleygreen made an interesting point about (non) future of East Dulwich in the context of the current estimate that sea levels will rise 65 metres when the ice caps have melted.


Some years back when I first read about the ice caps melting I got out an old 6" Ordnance Survey map of East Dulwich and checked the benchmarks and spot heights. These ranged from about 160 feet above sea level at The Plough going down to about 60 feet above sea level at Goose Green.


I thought about a few decades in the future when The Plough pub would be renamed The Marine Hotel and the Plough area would be East Dulwich-on-Sea. I even had a smirk about a smart young entrepreneur starting a business offering boat trips to the Alexandra Palace.


But that was when the estimates were up to 50 metres.


Now the estimates are 65 metres and more we are talking about Crystal Palace-on-Sea and Crystal Palace Parade being a seaside promenade.


The timescales for the current estimates are much debated but many of the estimates are within the lifespans of homes now being bought in East Dulwich.


So, a question.


When people have a site survey done for a prospective home purchase in East Dulwich is there now a section in the survey report that details the height above sea level of the property and its implications?


I've heard that some of the smart mobile phones young people have these days have built-in GPS devices. I be interested in some reports of the heights above sea level of some of the East Dulwich landmarks such as the Crystal Palace Tavern.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/984-east-dulwich-on-sea/
Share on other sites

Forest Hill is a deceptive.


Some parts are only a few feet higher than the Crystal Palace Tavern. But most parts of Forest Hill should still be above water until around 2038.


So, Renzon, have you actually checked the height above sea level of your home?


And, Keef, you're probably right about Sydenham, but do you include drinking 100 feet under water as one of your skills?

I've had a quick peek. My house is 125ft up, so good for a couple more years, by which time I'm sure I will have cashed in on the huge price rises for homes at the tops of hills :D


From my calculations Forest Hill station is 183 ft, and the Hornimann seems about as safe as you can ask for locally at 272 ft up!!


You're laughing in Crystal Palace, the triangle being a mighty 367 ft up, isn't that a mountain in England?

> I've heard that some of the smart mobile phones

> young people have these days have built-in GPS

> devices. I be interested in some reports of the

> heights above sea level of some of the East

> Dulwich landmarks such as the Crystal Palace

> Tavern.

Commercial GPS is not wholly accurate. I rode to Sevenoaks last week, and using my GPS system got home to discover I had tackled a 600m peak on the way!


Can i suggest you just get an OS map, and look at the contours...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government 
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...