Jump to content

Poor cauli


ken78

Recommended Posts

You are so thick mate! You do realise, that by using inverted commas ('The Lane'), i was being sarcastic? Call it a little English Literature lesson for you.


BTW, im banned from replying from threads, hence the private message.

THIS IS WHAT POOR OLD CAULI SENT ME IN A P.M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always feel sorry for people like Cauli


Obviously young, emotionally immature and possibly with bullying issues (hence their retorts when challenged)


Inspired to become a hacker but limted by only having their dad's hand me down sinclair spectrum so in frustration they register on public forums to post gobbledegook and try and build up a following of people who they want to be adored by, instead they alienate everyone.


They want to crack the access code to playboy but instead end up on guysonly.com where they find that they aren't the most sarcastic person in the room.


Cauli may well grow up to serve a useful position in society but not everyone wants fries with their burger.


Excitement ranges from trolling on websites to a box of kleenex and babestation


So instead on malaligning poor Cauli, we should offer them a strong shoulder to help them grow and become useful to society.


😅

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always feel sorry for people like Cauli

>

> Obviously young, emotionally immature and possibly

> with bullying issues (hence their retorts when

> challenged)

>

> Inspired to become a hacker but limted by only

> having their dad's hand me down sinclair spectrum

> so in frustration they register on public forums

> to post gobbledegook and try and build up a

> following of people who they want to be adored by,

> instead they alienate everyone.

>

> They want to crack the access code to playboy but

> instead end up on guysonly.com where they find

> that they aren't the most sarcastic person in the

> room.

>

> Cauli may well grow up to serve a useful position

> in society but not everyone wants fries with their

> burger.

>

> Excitement ranges from trolling on websites to a

> box of kleenex and babestation

>

> So instead on malaligning poor Cauli, we should

> offer them a strong shoulder to help them grow and

> become useful to society.

>

> 😅


and the same for all that troll the net as you say


offer them a strong shoulder to help them grow and

become useful to society. is that what you think ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken, just had an image of you with your arms deep in a bowel of East DAZwich washing suds trying to get logic out of posts 🤔🤣


Was amused that your DM thanked me for your "Massage" (I didn't touch him honest Admin)


As said in my message to you, Caulie sent me not one but two (possibly flaming) PMs both deleted unopened. Maybe my analysis above hit a nerve .. we will never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks but I still have no idea what you are talking about can you not say what you need to say that I can make sense of or is to hard for you to do ?? Hope not but we will see and PLEASE PLEASE dont have any more images of me
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ken78 wrote:

> --------------

> > ianr wrote:

> > -----------

> >> Is this you?

> https://twitter.com/jones_hernehill/status/9410284

> 39569641472

>

> > i wished i was that fast

>

> You've not answered my question. Is it you? If

> it's not, please say so.


no not me i wish it was i don't work any more give it up as a bad job

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...