Jump to content

Brockwell Lido


Recommended Posts

At Brockwell Park Lido this morning I witnessed a little girl drowning or nearly drowning (she was taken to hospital unconscious and I don't know what happened to her after that) and wondered if anyone else was there to discuss this with me and help me to decide on the appropriate action to take regarding the appalling lack of any sort of training it appeared the 2 lifeguards had received. I had spent Monday and Tuesday at the lido and the pool (olympic sized) was packed with people all day. there were only two lifeguards at any one time, and during yesterday and the day before I didn't hear a whistle blown once. There were hoards of teenagers jumping, bombing on top of each others heads,diving, throwing each other in and running fast and throwing themselves and others in the pool. At the time of the incident I saw a young woman jump in the pool in front of me and pull out a little girl's lifeless body not more than a few yards away from the lifeguard, with the young woman shouting for the lifeguard to do something but she appeared not to have noticed anything going on, and then instead of putting out a tannoy message for a doctor or nurse no one did anything for several minutes with the little girl on her back until someone thought to put her on her side. It appeared no one knew what to do until the paramedics arrived. I spend a lot of time at pools and there are always rules about jumping and diving etc. in fact I think sometimes they're too strict but at Brockwell Park Lido there are no rules, which is lovely if you have enough lifeguards to look after everyone but two guards and no rules is ludicrous, I fear the little girl may have been jumped on or overcome by water when kids were bombing in the pool. I don't know what to do now but can't rest until I know that someone has done something to make the place safer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How awful. I swim there regularly all year, and never have a problem (its normally quiet) but I have to say that this Monday was awful. It was absolutely chaotic and I can well imagine how this could have happened. I only lasted 20 minutes and got out. It definitely needs to be better "policed" at busy holiday times.


I also don't think it helps that so much space is laned off, leaving only a relatively small area (with an even smaller shallow end) for all the kids to play in. It would be better to rope off an area widthways for small kids I think, and have two lifeguards on the width of that end. The teenagers need to be sent off down the other end away from them and controlled better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have written to my local MP about this, so thanks for all your helpful replies. I know that at the Guildford Lido there are 5 lifeguards on high chairs and 4 walking around the pool. Someone posted that smoking wasn't allowed even in quiet times but when I was there on Monday, Tuesday and yesterday there were people all around me smoking. The place was filthy too, bins overflowing and rubbish being blown around. I've never seen anyone clearing any rubbish at all - I can't imagine another country putting up with this, my daughter won't allow me to take her 10 year old twins to the place, I know why now!! I was talking to a lady yesterday who swims there summer and winter and she was saying how dirty the place was and the water didn't look clean at all.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Janie and others on this thread. I'd be very interested in looking into this for BBC Radio London.

Please email me a contact number as soon as you can as today is my last day in for a couple of weeks! [email protected]

Also which is your local MP? I will follow this up.


Best regards


Anna O'Neill

Broadcast Journalist

BBC Radio London

0207 765 1157

@annareporting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure the lido (run by fusion?) will need to do a health and safety review of the incident and as you were a witness can you write to them? Then they have to formally investigate your witness statement and surely they'll have to remediate the low standards? I'm sure they'd welcome independent feedback. (Edited to make clear an investigation of the witness statement to add to their own inevitable review of what happened)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clean and tidy today when we were there... as usual.


Lifeguards were on the ball - as I've usually found.


Perhaps they should have stepped up their game with the heat and possibly controlled the numbers...howver I am absolutely shocked to read that the staff did not know what to do. I kow they train, I've been there in winter and they've been training to cover all conditions.


They are paid low wage... is that normal for a position of such responsibility?


This will be taken seriously and I hope a fact finding to understand what happened

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or, the child survived in spite of the staffs' purported lack of action. I don't know. I wasn't there. But it's not logical to conclude one way or the other that the outcome was entirely and only dependent on the lifeguards. Also, because details don't appear to have been released due to privacy, there's no way to know what extent of injury this child suffered. And, agreed seconds can seem longer to onlookers; however, seconds do count when someone is drowning. The OP appears to be an eye witness and felt strongly enough about it to raise concerns. I can't see any reason to downplay that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alice, your post has really rattled me! Staff clearly did NOT know what to do as the little girl was pulled from the water by a member of the public. That is shocking in itself. The fact that she survived is down to the quick thinking of the young woman who jumped in to save her. Then she was left on her back and no call was made for a doctor or nurse! It's all there in the op.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why on earth is that shocking! It's great that the 1st person to notice acted. And who was supposed to be responsible for this child?



Edited to say : It seems now that it was the child's mother who jumped in after her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know where the carer of the child was. Or was that a rhetorical question? and how does the whereabouts of this child's carer have any bearing on the questions being asked about the performance of the Life Guards?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...