Jump to content

Southwark Meadows Day


Recommended Posts

I am very concerned about moves to attempt to further en-forest what has traditionally been meadowland in Camberwell Old Cemetery.


OK ? I know this is a wind-up ? but not entirely so. Those who walk in the cemetery will have noted that quite a large portion of the currently-in-use area at the south (ish) end has been left un-cut so creating a hay meadow. With the addition of some wild flower seeds (such as are growing currently in the bed in the Horniman gardens) this would re-create the traditional meadowland (with all the benefits to wild-life, bees and butterflies etc.) that were probably its pre-cemetery origins in the meadowland/ pastureland originally bought from a farmer when the cemetery was first created.


This is (in wild-life and ?nature? terms) a far more productive use for the land than the scrub-growth which is proposed for clearance. And is more true to the ?original? land use pre-cemetery.


It would also be wholly consistent with its continued use for burials ? hay meadows are traditionally cut-back in late summer ? but can be allowed to grow back up the following year. Thus the objectives of both nature lovers and those who wish the area to continue to be of service to the relics of Southwark residents can be met.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The council's plan is for meadow areas to be reused for burials as well after the wooded areas are used - much like the area on wood vale. The council have been asked for natural meadow burials in the meadow areas to preserve them but they have refused so far. The meadow areas you like will be gone to.


Have you actually walked arround the areas to be developed penguin? There is a oak with of a girth of 4ms in there. That would mean the tree predates the cemetery and be close to the enclosure act date. The old native oaks are repopulating the area so the there are lots of young oak saplings in the area. There are younger native shrub plants hawthorn, elder growing in between the larger trees a "scrub" as call it but these are very important to wildlife and beautiful imo.


So yes let's save the meadows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trees have always formed part of the 'furniture' of cemeteries (yew, very traditionally) and I have no doubts that the oak you refer to was either an initial cemetery planting or may even date back to an original hedgerow oak in the originating pastureland. I would be surprised, if it is healthy, that the council would clear this (their tree officer would surely object, if it was brought to his attention).


The area which is now the equivalent of hay meadow covers old graves, now seldom if at all visited, so being obscured by hay in the summer isn't an issue. Cemeteries are long-term investments in the ecology - new burials will, for some time, I'm sure, be kept clear to allow ease of visiting - but over time the reversion of land to a 'wilder' (without being scrub woodland) state is something to be encouraged (and means that the cost of upkeep, not mowing during the summer for instance, will be contained).


We need to consider the long-run life(!) of a cemetery - bits will be old burials, bits new - and these will be treated and look different. Trying to freeze in time the look of the cemetery makes no real sense, but a long term plan which is sensitive both to the environment and to the needs of those wishing to use it for its primary purpose does make sense. The continuation of overgrown elements (particularly where access to these is actually hazardous with unstable monuments) really doesn't make sense in this context. Sensible planting of native species in recovered areas (like the dogwood plantation at the Langston Rise end) seem a good option - so Hawthorne and Elder additionally planted once the scrub has been recovered - but in an appropriate position for using the cemetery - again makes sense.


Leaving self-seeded shrubs wherever they have happened to self-seed doesn't in a managed environment, which is what a cemetery needs to be. Even the growth in Dulwich Woods (which really are woods, and managed as such, if only secondary growth around a former railway line) have to be tended to carefully. No woods are really wild in the UK, nor would you actually want them to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Penguin68, you sound well informed. Are you able to put that to good use by talking directly to the people in charge of the cemetery and their bosses?

Whilst it's a good thing to share you knowledge here it's unlikely to reach the powers that be unless you make an effort to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Even Mr James Barber is now falsely calling this

> overgrown area "Southwark Woods".

>

> SE22 Magazine, Issue 126. page 44.


Really? I never had him down as an opportunistic bandwagon jumper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...