Jump to content

mother in law moving in with us, parking?


Recommended Posts

My elderly mother in law is moving in with us (health, desire to be close to family reasons). She is still able to drive and we would need to get a street parking permit for her. Does anyone know if it is possible to get another permit for our house? I heard that it is only one permit per house in Southwark. Any advice greatly appreciated. Thanks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume you live in a Southwark CPZ? If so, which one?


There's nothing on here http://www.southwark.gov.uk/parking/parking-permits/on-street-permits/resident-parking-permits which suggests it's only one permit per household - so many houses are shared accommodation that would be pretty unworkable in my view, but there are some special rules in particular places. Best to ask Southwark if you want an absolutely clear answer for your street.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The practical issue may be proving that she lives at the property with you to a sufficient level to get the permit - if she's registered on the electoral roll there that looks like it should be enough for the online application form.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your mother-in-law is moving to you permanently then she will also need to get a new Driving Licence issued to the correct address (that's the law, not an option) - if she has lived for a long time where she is moving from then she will probably also need to apply for a new photo-ID Driving Licence (clearly with a photo) - as she probably still has the old pink paper Licence.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

She doesn't qualify for a BB. She's moving in so that she can be near us and because she's a bit infirm, but she can still get about. I guess we're not expecting her infirmity to get better (she is in her mid-80s) but hope it won't go as far as being severely restricted in terms of arm and leg movement.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will she want to drive? My Mum drove until very recently (she's 88) but she wasn't really safe. Outside London it's very hard to to without a car because there's virtually no public transport. But in London she might do better on the bus if you are close to the bus routes on DKH
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You did well. My Mum only stopped when it became clear that she would fail her eyesight tests and be stopped.


I know that my re-action speeds fell in my 50s. My Mum in her 70s and 80s was forever being taken by surprise by other road users "Where did that lorry come from?". Always other people's fault for creeping up on her and "appearing out of nowhere"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, you did very well.


This has become a major problem for many families, including mine. An obvious need for legislation (both for mandatory re-testing and mandatory reporting by GPs of failing health to DVLA). Many elderly drivers are very good drivers and will easily pass such tests; but many are not, as the tragic cases reported in the news indicate.


The good relations of my own family have been at severe risk from this. A parent who should not drive (believe me), but who is convinced that they are absolutely fine. A GP who felt their duty of care was to support the expressed interests of the patient not the wider community, despite the overwhelming medical evidence. Persuasion fails. Then what do you do?


Now in my '50s I have become father to my parents: they do not take kindly to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are concerned about elderly drivers, notify the DVLA directly (and anonymously) here https://emaildvla.direct.gov.uk/emaildvla/cegemail/dvla/en/drivers_med_03.html


Or tell the driver's GP of your concerns and they (should) notify DVLA which would result in an instant revocation.


(Bagpipes full credit to you, if my MIL was moving in a parking permit would be the last thing on my mind!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jennys Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suspect the doctor would not speak to family

> members only to their named patient. But worth a

> try.


You are correct Jennys, and we did try. I do not blame the GP: they rightly have their own ethical code and (to be clear) I do not want my GP sharing my own medical info with anyone - that is, unless it is a matter of law (as it is, for example, with infectious diseases for the sake of the wider community). That it is not in this case makes matters very difficult. And no, Lowlander, my experience (of course this may not be a general rule) is that they will not notify DVLA on their own initiative, on the same principle.


I take the point about the anonymous notification. However, the obvious problem is that then the question will arise as to who did the notification. It will not have been the GP under the current law ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...