Jump to content

"Achilles Heel" Radical mens movement mag 1980's ?39.49


rgutsell

Recommended Posts

THREE ISSUES OF "ACHILLES HEEL" RADICAL MEN'S MAGAZINE

Issues nos 17, 22, and 23.

Part of the post feminist 1980's/90's "Men's Movement" in which groups of men were seeking to re-identify new roles and understanding for men. Produced by a Socialist working mens collective. They appeared at roughly the same time as the Ill fated CSA got going, and the role of men in the family was being re-evaluated.

Issue 17;

inc "Child Support, Class subversion, Crass Scapegoating"

"Families need Fathers" an investigation by Vic Siedler

"Addicted to Dysfunction"

" Heavily Scarred, Macho maligned and loved"

"Father Apart"

Issue 22

" Power within and without"

" Nine types of power"

"The psychology of mens power"

"Masculinity and power"

"Re-thinking mens power"

"Sharing power; entering womens space"

Issue 23 (music issue)

"River Deep Mountain high"

"Orbital-inside out"

"Exile on main street"

"Young mans blues"

"Papa was nearly a rolling stone"

"Dancing towards 60"

"Being a whole man is childs play"

"Politics and pro feminisms across the pond"

"Communication breakdown"

Issues are A4 format, 44 pages, black and white throughout, with colour front covers. Supportive and in-depth text in double or three columns per page.

These are rare magazines, and great social history. Excellent source document for students.

Postage will be A4 " Large letter" rate;

?1.65 uninsured.

You can pay by PO or cheque, please be patient whilst funds are cleared before I post.m Or collect. PM me here or 07585273685 or [email protected]

Get in touch with any questions or requests for more info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...