Jump to content

Antique Victorian satinwood and mahogany compendium wardrobe


dclay

Recommended Posts

Extremely fine quality early 19th century satinwood and mahogany compendium wardrobe with kingwood crossbanding . The central door with large feathered mahogany oval panel and three dummy drawers opening to reveal three real drawers with five sliding tray drawers above . Door to left opens to reveal brass hanging clothes rail . Door to right opens to reveal another hanging dress rail with full length mirror to back of door . All fittings , handles , hinges , rails and mirror are original to the piece . For ease of transportation the wardrobe breaks down into eight sections . Please note one handle to inside bottom drawer is lacking it's bail and there is some damage to veneer as would be expected for age. Further pictures can be provided on request - please PM for better quality and more pics.


?400 ono.


Dimensions:

78" wide

79" wide base

23" deep

21" deep interior

78.5" high


Collection from SE26 6JA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...