Otta

I have no issue at all with IVF, I know couples who've had to go down that road and it's wonderful they've had that option. I'm not entirely against surrogacy, but I don't like the fact people can go and pay a poor girl from a poor country with very littke (or no) regulation.

It's obviously a complicated and emotive subject, but I don't disagree with you maxxi.

Millhaven Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The seller's name sounds like a porn star's. That was my first thought too.

Sachets of Oat so simple, 2 minutes in the microwave. Chuck in some honey and serve with a little jug of cold milk (like you get with a pot of tea in a cafe) which my girl likes to pour in. Sachets are a more expensive way of doing it, but they're often on offer and they take away so much faff that they're worth it. Plus no saucepan to wash up.

It all sounds very iffy. They (apparently) spent a lot of money, and the agencty seems to have closed it's doors. I keep thinking surely some hospital staff or someone has some idea what the hell went on. Very odd story.

If they're around 14 shouldn't they be off trying to buy booze?

foxgirl, where YOU with the people that ALLEGEDLY only got 3 tickets after paying for 4? Or have you just read a thread started by someone who is more than likely just trying to shit stir, and taken it at face value? I don't get what your agenda is here other than to try and stir up trouble. If you have evidence that some sort of fraud is happening, take it to the appropriate authorities. If not (which I suspect is the case), have a word with yourself.

edcam Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The general feeling among agents seems to be that > prices have levelled off in recent weeks. People > have been asking for overinflated prices The agents feel that people have been asking for overinflated prices? Wonder where the people got that idea.

I suspect that kid's parents wouldn't use the term "little darlings". Doesn't really fit does it. I am largely on the same side as everyone that thinks these kids should be hanging around elsewhere, and that community officers should be having words if they are behaving inappropriately. But I also agree pretty strongly with

Fair enough, I'd missed the 9/10/11 bit in your last post and assumed we were talking about older kids. My mistake.

I'm not demeaning the result at all, it was a great result for Arsenal. I'm just saying I don't get excited about the CS anymore, whereas I used to be well up for it, whoever was playing.

See now spitting, that IS feral. But as standswithfist has told us, that was a few years back, so it is not the same kids who are there now.

I can barely force myself to watch the charity shield if Liverpool are playing in it. Glorified pre season friendly, means nothing. Season starts next week. Hurrah!

Not impossible, but not as definite as you seem to think. And RE "feral", the cap doesn't fit.

Yeah, saying someone needs a slap is pretty far from actually going and slapping a teenager. it isn't acceptable and they should be moved on (as I've said repeatedly), but that still doesn't make them feral low life and future knife carrying gang members. This isn't The Wire season 4.

I have to say that calling them feral low life, and suggesting with assurance that they are the next generation of knife welding muggers is a bit bloody much. They are bored kids. Yes they need to piss off somewhere else, and the one that threatened to punch a small kid needs a slap, but let's not get carried away.

Think Liverpool spoke to him but Rogers quickly said it wouldn't happen. Fuessingw that's either his wage demands or the fact that Rogers could do without a complete loon in his strike force for a change.

Apparently Suarez's legal team are confident his ban will be halved, which will mean he's available by 25th August. Should have held out for a few more mil.

Nice to see some passion.

I wouldn't say there was any fuss.

Yep, not Celtic's fault at all, but still really harsh. Imagine how the players at Legia must be feeling. I'm off to put a fiver on Celtic to win the whole thing now.

"Hamlet Lager" A.K.A. Oranjeboom (Or it was last season anyway)

yeknomyeknom Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If you intend to frequent the cinema it was a > great deal. Also able to be used at their other > cinemas until ours opened. Also it isn't > necessarily about vanity for all. I bought a > membership for my little boy so he can see his > name up on the screen when he's a bit older. We > love films and I think it would be exciting for > him. I hope it will also show him we are a > community and he is an established part of that. > Maybe if he gets older and moves away he will > always feel his roots in ED where he was born and > his name up in artwork in a community institution > compounds this. Things can just be done because > it's fun, positive and exciting. I'm sure you did it because it's fun, positive and exciting, and doing it for your kid is a lovely idea, but Picturehouse did it to get people signing up, end of. I'm not against them by the way, and agree that membership is quite good value.

We all need a shelter Alice, it's dangerous out there.

Have you alice? You could build a shelter to keep them safe.