whibel

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> whibel Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > There is a context to London's riots that can't

> be

> > ignored

> >

> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/0

>

> > 8/context-london-riots

>

> I call bullsh*t. 14-year-olds out on the streets

> looting have spent all but one of those years

> under a Labour government. Any responsibility

> there?

yeah. i get the picture. nice dropping in on your folks. goodbye east dulwich forum, enjoy your cupcakes, etc.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> whibel Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > There is a context to London's riots that can't

> be

> > ignored

> >

> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/0

>

> > 8/context-london-riots

>

> I call bullsh*t. 14-year-olds out on the streets

> looting have spent all but one of those years

> under a Labour government. Any responsibility

> there?

yeah. i get the picture. nice dropping in on your folks. goodbye east dulwich forum, enjoy your cupcakes.

There is a context to London's riots that can't be ignored

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/08/context-london-riots

Alex K Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This sort of thing just pushes further and further

> into the future any decision by Waitrose to open

> on Lordship Lane.

surely another contender for Post of the Year. brilliant.

thebestnameshavegone Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm expecting Ocado literally any minute - does

> anyone know if they've been able to get through

> Rye Lane?

( just checking - you are being ironic? )