Jump to content

paco

Member
  • Posts

    235
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by paco

  1. 23 hours ago, eastdulwichproperty said:

    Well done Councillor McAsh for standing up in front of this angry mob, he was one of the few sensible people in the room. His calm and reasoned responses were well presented in very hostile circumstances. Several people asked 'why this was happening?' and clearly hadn't understood the problem that was trying to be solved. The attached document 'Foreword' section summarises the overall problem clearly and concisely. I'm sure that there are many more people that would have spoken up in favour of the plans if the meeting hadn't degenerated into an angry shouting match (I say match but of course all the shouting was in one direction), it would take a brave person to stand up to that. Through all the shouting I didn't actually hear anything sensible or constructive from the opposition, what is their solution to the problem?

    Streets for People Strategy 2023-2030.pdfStreets for People Strategy 2023-2030.pdfStreets for People Strategy 2023-2030.pdfStreets for People Strategy 2023-2030.pdfStreets for People Strategy 2023-2030.pdfStreets for People Strategy 2023-2030.pdf 5.41 MB · 11 downloads

    Unfortunately, some people didn't contribute in a constructive way - speaking over others wasn't useful.

    Did you speak up and say anything sensible or constructive?

    Maybe consider why people were angry.

    The Council want to impose the CPZ and constructed the meeting so that people wouldn't get the opportunity to see how others felt.

    This is not consultation. It's a con and it's insulting.

    I don't think Councillor McAsh's responses were well presented at all.

    1 hour ago, Stuka said:

    It wasn't a small minority. It was the vast majority. Cllr McCash was constantly shouted at, heckled and interrupted. He was sworn at and compared to the Nazis. I lost count of the number of times he had to say something like "I will try answer all your questions but I can't if people are going to continue to shout and talk over me." He kept is calm throughout and continued to try and answer people. 

    Yes it was a small minority. A few people kept speaking over others. This was annoying.

    The majority of people waited their turn to speak. 

    The Councillor didn't really address some of the questions asked and clearly didn't want an open meeting in the first place!

  2. 9 hours ago, Rockets said:

    Paco, how many people were there?

     

    The only thing the council will listen to is a concerted barrage of noise telling them how wrong they are and how this is not a consultation, nor do they have a mandate to impose this. The last consultation was equivocal, Dulwich residents did not want CPZs and until such time as they run a consultation that allows you to oppose it then the last consultation results should carry over.

     

    What they are doing is utterly undemocratic and very un-Labour and could have serious ramifications for their political careers - if enough people rally against them and make them realise that the people are against them.

    Power to the People and all that!

    I would guess around 100 - 120 people.

    In other boroughs there have been court cases.

    This is only a done deal if we all roll over.

    I agree - their legacy will be a loss of trust in the Labour Party.

    I saw the look of shame on one Councillor's face as he left the building. 

    On 14/07/2023 at 01:23, CPR Dave said:

    I think this is a done deal tbh, 

    It's a shame because it will push up house prices even more and squeeze poor people out of the area, further consolidating East Dulwich as an enclave for the rich upper classes.

    Hope for the sake of the people behind this policy that those kind of residents believe in the "equality" mission and keep on voting Labour.,

    It is only a done deal if people roll over and accept it.

    Other boroughs have taken court action 

    On 16/07/2023 at 00:16, modernMajorGeneral said:

    You are correct; in the council's eyes, they are doing this. That is not a reason to lie down and accept this position. The council is wrong and behaving undemocratically. We must tell them.

    Hi everyone, we formed a group in Nunhead and Queens Road to oppose the council's introduction of a CPZ. We now want to expand our remit to push back on the whole ridiculous policy across the whole borough. If we can get the whole borough to demand that the council revert to its 2018 position, where CPZs were put in on when local residents requested it in response to parochial parking challenges, then we may have a chance to win.

    They can ignore the protestations from each group. Can they really ignore the whole borough? Please come and join us on https://opposethecpz.org, and anyone who is able to bring their time, effort and skills to the team, do get in touch.

    Also, spread the word. Tell everyone. 

    Thanks,

    Richard.

    Thanks for this information Richard.

    I hope others get involved - I will.

    • Like 2
  3. I have just returned from a consultation meeting on the Streets For People' at the Church in Barry Road.

    When I arrived, people were queuing outside the Church - the reason was that they had to wait their turn to sit in small groups to chat with a Councillor.

    It is clear that this was designed to avoid an open discussion on the imposition of a controlled parking zone (CPZ) in East Dulwich.

    It was also clear that the majority of people attending the meeting were not in favour of such 'divide and rule' tactics - and we ended up having an open meeting.

    I am shocked that a Labour Council could stoop so low as to treat the people they represent with such contempt and shocked that Labour Councillors would participate in such an exercise.

    We were told that it had been made clear on the website/eventbrite that this was how the meeting would be held - I have just looked, to see this is patently not the case - see screenshots.

    One Councillor stated there has not been any consultation on whether people want a CPZ - the views of the people they represent aren't courted - the  Council knows best.


    This is at odds with the website that says:

    "Why your views matter

    We want your views on the Streets for People proposal in your area. In particular we want your input on what days and hours you would prefer the controlled parking to operate - it is important to answer these questions even if your own preference is not to have controlled parking."

    Why tell us our views matter and the pretence of consultation if this has already been decided?

    Only one person at the meeting said they were in favour of the CPZ- by a show of hands.

    Others had left by this point - in disgust.

    I had hoped to be convinced that this would be a beneficial thing for East Dulwich, but the Councillor failed to make the case for imposing a CPZ.

    This amounts to meddling by the Council.

    If the majority of people are in favour (or don't care), so be it.

    There is no guarantee that this can be stopped, but the only way there is any chance of stopping this is if enough people object to this.
    Perhaps those of us who feel the same way could get together and consider what action we can take.

    Shall we roll over or kick off?

    Screenshot 2023-07-17 at 20.52.53.png

    Screenshot 2023-07-17 at 21.20.53.png

    Screenshot 2023-07-17 at 21.21.14.png

    • Like 1
  4. Hi All


    I have been stung by people doing the following - one from a tradesman recommended on this site.


    1. Getting a quote

    When I texted one tradesman asking for his hourly rate, he phoned me back and stated that he charged ?75/hour.


    When he sent me an invoice, the hourly rate was actually ?90/hour.


    My mistake for not asking if that included VAT.


    However, I spoke to someone who said he did exactly the same to him - gave hime a verbal price of ?75, didn't mention VAT and didn't put it in writing.


    2. Price increase

    A few people have quoted me a price verbally, but when they arrive to do the job, they say "The part costs more than I realised." In one case, the prices was double what had been quoted.


    SO:

    1. Get a written quote - check if it includes VAT

    2. Consider whether to decline the work if the cost of a part goes up

    3. Check the price of parts - I was charged more than the price I could have got the part for!


    Simon

  5. I?m planning to do a chap called Brian Johnson?s Optimize Coach 300 day course.


    It?s been scientifically validated ? they have some great speakers/trainers in the faculty.


    It normally costs $1000 ? but at the moment two people can do it for $300.


    If you?re interested let me know.


    If you want to do the course, happy to share the cost.


    https://www.optimize.me/coach


    It starts 3 January.


    Feel free to PM of text me.


    Simon

    07906 568843

  6. Hi All


    I am a Hypnotherapist and Coach based in East Dulwich.


    I am doing a free Guided Relaxation on Friday 10th at 11am BST and each Friday, for the time being.


    This will take place online, using Zoom.


    The session will be around half an hour, including a brief opportunity to give feedback/connect with other participants at the end.


    Use this link to access details:


    https://resilience.uk.com/guided-relaxation/


    Any questions, do get in touch.


    Simon Pimenta

    07906 568843

  7. Hi All


    I am a Hypnotherapist working at Bellenden Therapies and have organised an Emergency First Aid at Work training course.


    If you are a practitioner and need to do this course (it is a requirement that it is done every 3 years), read on...


    Details of the course here:


    http://www.tutorcare.co.uk/first-aid-training-courses/emergency-first-aid


    The scheduled date is Friday 6th December, 9.30am - 4.30pm.


    Do contact Tutor Care if you need to know anything else about the course.


    We have 4 currently and you and one other are interested.


    The fee is ?534.60 divided by all participants, so will be:


    ?107 if one more person attends

    ?76 if we have 7 people.


    If you attend a training course individually, cost is ?162/person.


    If you would like to join us, let me know asap.


    First come basis.


    Simon Pimenta

    07906 568843

  8. Come to the Clockhouse Open Mic + Sing and Jam.


    We will be upstairs in the Blake Room, hidden behind a fake bookcase. Very Harry Potter.


    Bring your voices and/or instruments: guitars, keyboard, violin, percussion, mouth organ etc. and have a good sing.


    Everyone joins in, so no performance pressure.


    How does it work?


    If anyone wants to do an Open Mic, where anyone can do a song, they are welcome.


    Otherwise we will Sing and Jam - anyone can suggest a song and we all sing/play along.


    What Genres?

    For the Open Mic, anything you like.


    For the Sing and Jam, perhaps stuff that isn't too obscure and that people are likely to know, as participation is the point!


    Join the Facebook Group here:


    https://www.facebook.com/groups/412271166103997/


    Simon

    07906 568 843

  9. Come to the Clockhouse Open Mic + Sing and Jam.


    We will be upstairs in the Blake Room, hidden behind a fake bookcase. Very Harry Potter.


    Bring your voices and/or instruments: guitars, keyboard, violin, percussion, mouth organ etc. and have a good sing.


    Everyone joins in, so no performance pressure.


    How does it work?


    If anyone wants to do an Open Mic, where anyone can do a song, they are welcome.


    Otherwise we will Sing and Jam - anyone can suggest a song and we all sing/play along.


    What Genres?

    For the Open Mic, anything you like.


    For the Sing and Jam, perhaps stuff that isn't too obscure and that people are likely to know, as participation is the point!


    Simon

    07906 568 843

  10. Sorry snoopy17 missed your message.


    Benefits:


    It's faster

    Is a requirement for SMART tech - it means that you would be able to turn your kettle on without having to get up, run your bath whilst you are travelling home etc etc. Think they are talking about it be used for cars- driverless..

  11. Sephiroth, once again, I agree with you!


    All of this has to be stress tested and credibility checked.


    Which sources are you suggesting come from sites like David Icke?


    Currently looking at counter arguments.


    But also looking at the bigger picture, looking at how the rollout has been implemented, it raises questions.


    The knee jerk reaction towards anyone who questions the status quo is that they must be a crank. They must be a tin foil hat wearing, lentil eating, tree hugger.


    I am guilty of this reaction.


    When someone first knocked on my door talking about phone masts, I did think "Who is this crazy do gooder person?"


    But digging deeper into the issue uncovered some interesting information.


    A point made by Jeromy Johnson in TED Talk, 'Wireless wake-up call':


    "The science is heavily influenced by industry funding. This is a study by Dr. Henry Lai. He looked at 326 studies based on the biological effects of cell phone radiation. He found that about half of the studies showed effects and half didn't.


    That's pretty normal for this type of research.


    But what he found that was interesting was that if you looked at who funded the studies, 70% of the independent studies showed effects, and only 32% of the industry-funded studies showed effects."


    This article elaborates the story:


    https://www.seattlemag.com/article/uw-scientist-henry-lai-makes-waves-cell-phone-industry

  12. If I get a real person...


    Car accident scams; I tell them I was involved in a car accident and I know who was driving the car, but don't know if he lives in Florida or Paris - it was a clown car and all the doors fell off. I ask them if they know where Mickey Mouse lives. They hang up.


    Or just ask them "Is that Aunt Sally? What do you want for tea?" etc. They hang up.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...