missteak

Its all in the tell innit.

Hegemony ffs

You just need dialectics and paradigm for the set. you are a true academic, then I pity the poor fools who have to listen to your uninspired monotone. If you are reduced to intellectual chest beating and cock waving on a feckin local forum. Then the education system is more broken than the cherry tree.

Yer peers must be shitting themselves about their career trajectory when they are up against a behemoth with such rigour who needs to patronise ( in both sense ) a local feckin board where the closure of a scabby deli proved to be the apex of Cartesian meandering.

Innit.

Confession time

I am Davis posting under another account in order to troll the forum. I will not post on this account any more.

Thank you .

Cliff richard. Buying a reduced price game of monopoly. He only wanted the get out of jail free card.

Yes,that shark has definitely been jumped.

Davis Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Which Meaning of Academic are we relating to

> here.

> > ?

> >

> > 1. Relating to institutionalized education and

> > scholarship, especially at a college or

> > university.

> >

> > 2. Relating to studies that rely on reading and

> > involve abstract thought rather than being

> > primarily practical or technical.

> >

> > 3. Having little practical use or value, as by

> > being overly detailed, unengaging, or

> > theoretical.

> >

> > 4. Having no important consequence or

> relevancy:

> >

> > DulwichFox

>

> By 'academics' I meant people teaching, studying

> or researching in higher education or anyone with

> an interest in academia.

Or "wankers" as they are commonly known

Extra curricular party activity

Them so called academics ain't able to cope wiv the world outside there books and there clever posh mates with degrees and stuff.

PS I don'tuderstand about wot yer books and ritin is about but it does smell like summit that forrener chompsky has already done

Big words an hard sums ain't no use in the real world - no street smarts is from teachers innit

Thses boffins with letters after there names should try a real job sometime. No one never learned nothing from no teacher

I went on a plane once. It was very quiet apart from from a baby crying twice

.don't see what the fuss is about.

This has nothing to do with to foxes - when you focus on the act, you miss the point. Start a thread on fois gras or whaling of whatever crap you need to get you through the day, but filling a foxhunt topic with emotional minutae and wiki sourced filler ensures that we never get to the meat of things.

We Ned more a academics on the forum..oh hang on a minute...

I hate linguistics with a passion. And gnocci. In fact anyhing pasta based apart from penne shaped stuff

vesti Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Original thread started by Missteak (see other

> posts, not super pleasant) and now this by Dilcam.

> Both newly registered.

>

> Some agenda going on.

I did not start thread. Do you wish to offer an apology?

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For someone registered today you seem very

> familiar with the forum.

To be fair, all local forums have the same roster of chrachters - artifice or not - a cursary skim can identify the habitual strawmen foistererers, wiki blusterers and right\left polemicists . its the Richard Branson approach - try everything and see which ones provide the most return for effort input. I am not a troll , but that is hardly going to inspire any confidence is it ?

Merry Xmas from lower scumpton

Please, no roumour monging- this can lead to the wrong conclusion. He was a decent fellow and not deserving of anything scurrilous .

Don't worry your boffin head about it , I won't be here much longer I reckons.

More hot tugger action. Give it a break ffs, its supposed to be the season of goodwill and all that.

It only takes one goad to bring the tuggers on this forum.same old same old.

OK.I am going to leave this thread now. He was a decent chap.this is a very sad outcome.

What do you mean " very unlikely "?

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> certainly missteak but through the proper

> channels. why does it need to be public? unless

> 'in the public interest

I cannot post what I know to back this up I am afraid. We shall have to see how the church reacts. If at all.

CGsteveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Where would all those simple minded country

> bumpkins be without all us sophisticated townsfolk

> dictating how they should behave?

Without the urban masses to buy their produce and subsidise their trade, the country lot would be living in caves worshipping all manner of false agricultural themed idols and eating their first born. Fuck them.

This needs to be public. If you are a parishoner, you need to push for answers

The royals should be hunted down and torn apart by dogs. Humanely of course.