ElsaH

slarti b Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > goldilocks Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > >given the huge the huge increases in traffic > flowing through Dulwich > > Village in the last 5 years > > Can you provide a source for that please? > Soutwark Council's own traffic surveys do not > support that. > Their figures for DV over the last few years > show: > 2014 = 15,414 movements > 2015 = 15,055 > 2016 = 14,822 > 2017 = 10,007 low because of works to DV > 2018 = 14,375 estimate because they changed the > reporting basis > 2019 not yet published > > Overall it shows a slight decrease. Are they > wrong? Slarti b - where did you get this traffic data? Thanks!

Interesting traffic data. Please can you let us know the source? Thanks!

That's what I thought. I am in DV Zone B (the area that would be completely blocked in) and so we need all the support we can from E Dulwich residents in order to effectively oppose it. Do the residents of E Dulwich (especially those who were originally part of the consultation) intend to insist that they are brought back in as part of the process? Maybe request a public meeting in their area? Heaven knows what this proposal would do to Lordship Lane and other already saturated East Dulwich streets . . .

Does anyone know why East Dulwich residents North and East of Lordship Lane (all the way up to North Cross Road / Forest Hill Road, and all the way East to Underhill Road) were included in the Phase 1 consultation but then were omitted from Phases 2 and 3 . . . ?