Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I live in a building with 5 flats in underhill road east dulwich, i bought me flat a few years ago already


before we use to run the building ourselves but it has been nearly one year we have a professional management company(name available on request as no recommendable at all)

They do pretty much nothing for us...no cleaning communal areas no taking care of garden nothing nothing nothing..all year!


Since Before we passed the management to them i have had leak into my small bedroom of course after spending crazy money on renovating the flat. I spent more than i should have in renovations as my idea was to rent the small bedroom to help me out with bills. Previous self made management asked me to wait to fix the leak as they were about to pass all papers to the new management company. The company has been made aware of my problem on the first day they took over and since than very second week for the past 11 months. When they took over we had to pay an expensive bill straight away with nothing else than 15 days notice, no instalments and I still struggle to rent the room as although redone to very high standards, you can see, smell and feel the humidity coming from that leak in my ceiling. I have had a few lodgers and all complained and some left the room earlier than agreed as for this problem.

After one year in which the management company did nothing no even cleaning communal stairs etc and after more than 20 requests by email and more than 20 by phone they finally sent me an email today dated 25th-03 but sent today 01-04. I hoped it was about my problem with the leak but it was about new annual service charge to pay for ?1300...once again no instalments and 15 days notice (minus of course the 5 day it took them to sent the email)and...i still cannot rent that room...


My questions are:

-CAN I REFUSE TO PAY TILL I DON T SEE AT LEAST A SCHEDULED DATE FOR THEM TO FIX THE ROOF??WHAT HAPPENS IF I DO THAT??

CAN THEY TAKE ME TO COURT ETC??


- What could they do if i don t pay?


- How can i get rid off them? Who do i need to contact if i want to get rid off them in favour of any other company??


Thanx for reading and sorry if i was bit long and boring but it is getting very frustrating. a part from having to pay big money to them for nothing, I keep losing money and struggling these days with mortgage as i cannot count on renting that room..


Wish all a nice week end


vito

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/100380-service-charge/
Share on other sites

Sounds an all too common nightmare I'm afraid. The Leasehold Valuation Tribunal can order reductions in service charges if, as seems the case here, it's simply being used as an excuse for extra rent. This might help:


http://www.lease-advice.org/publications/documents/document.asp?item=18#13


See if your fellow tenants have similar greviances, if you withhold your service charge en masse they're more likely to get worried. They could technically evict you for non payment but the legal costs, bailiffs etc would come to far more than the ?1300. Perhaps the Citizen's Advice Bureau might be able to help you find the best way forward? http://www.lease-advice.org/publications/documents/document.asp?item=18#13


Good luck!


Rendel

muffins78 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Render, Can they evict a homeowner?

>

> I've pm'd you Vito!


I apologise, read too quickly and thought it was a tenancy. No then only in the most extreme circumstances and even then to seize a property they'd have to have the owner declared bankrupt, no court would order that for a ?1300 bill - my bad! But the advice about the LVT and CAB is still applicable.


I shall read more carefully in future!


Rendel

Are all the other leaseholders happy with the Management Company as I believe you have to have consent from the majority to hire a Management Company. One of my old work colleagues had a Management Company which the leaseholders were not happy with, and held a meeting and all agreed that they could do a better job themselves. I believe they went through a solicitor to sort it out. The freeholder was happy with their choice and raised no complaints

By the sound of it you all (the flat owners) collectively own the Freehold? If so, you will likely each have signed a Deed of Covenant promising not to let the building fall into disrepair. It is worth pointing out to the other flat owners that you are all collectively responsible for making sure this repair happens, and that this may involve electing another management company (or taking over the management yourselves). Pointing out the obligation to repair the roof may help to pressure the other flat owners into changing the management company.


If you aren't the freeholders, you can probably apply the same pressure to whoever is, and state that it's their problem to employ a management company to keep the building repaired.


As a previous joint Freeholder, I found asserting these obligations occasionally really helped to focus attention and to get folks to reach agreement and to get repairs arranged. This is particularly useful if you are up in the roof and have a leak, as other owners are likely personally unaffected by it. Remind them that they are affected by it, due to the obligations of being a freeholder.

You need to work out ASAP what the freehold arrangements are. If you Co own the freehold you will do so via a company of which you will be a shareholder That company should send you accounts every year and there will be an AGM. If that is the case speak to other shareholders and see if you can call an EGM to sack the useless agents and address the issue of the leaking roof.


If there is a separate freeholder then get together with your fellow leaseholders and investigate right to manage.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's regrettable that impact of the various topics of immigration have escalated to the level that people have to protest their unhappiness and that laws have to be rewritten, and yet people complain that those protesting are racist.       
    • I remember in the 70s the Union Jack was similarly appropriated by the National Front and later the British Party, I regarded it in the same way many perceive the St George's flag today. The Union Jack went through a period of rehabilitation in the 90s and probably viewed more positively by the left today. I wonder though if the anti immigration groups who have appropriated the St George;s flag realise that St George was born in what is modern day Turkey.
    • Certainly there are issues with  immigration which need to be addressed, but setting fire to buildings with immigrants in them is not the way to address them. Many (not all) of these people are fleeing from terrible situations in their own countries, and I can't even imagine what it must be like to finally reach somewhere where they hope they will be safe only to be "greeted" with violence and hostility. It makes me ashamed to be English, not proud. And yes, some of these people are here illegally, some of them are criminals or perpetrate attacks on women or whatever. And are dealt with accordingly. I read recently, and I don't know if it is true, that over 60% of the men arrested at the scene of attacks on immigrants and their temporary homes have previous convictions for  or are known to the police for domestic violence. Maybe look at yourselves first, eh, before trying to imply that because a few  immigrants commit a crime here therefore they are all criminals and shouldn't be allowed into our country. Why would someone fly the English flag in the present climate for any reason apart from being anti immigration?  What is a very unhealthy view? Are you replying to me? Yes the immigration law badly needs to be amended. I completely agree. I don't think I've said anything which implies otherwise?
    • That’s a very unhealthy view.  Particularly when the very top echelons admit that the immigration law is out of date and not relevant and is being amended as we speak.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...