Jump to content

the state of the local roads (not ED specific - potholes everywhere in the world)


Recommended Posts

just wondering why when we pay so much to tax, mot and insurance on our cars/vans that we cannot drive on the roads without having to dodge massive potholes??? i know theres been alot of rain latley but every year they get worse and every year we pay more tax etc. surely the roads should be smooth and not dangerous.


gary

We just had an extended spell of cold weather causing lots of damage due to freezing and yes there's a lot of potholes around.

I see gangs every day filling them in as I drive around; be fair, they can't do them all instantly.


Not sure where insurance comes into this btw?

Sorry, I wasn't clear. You seemed to link paying for insurance with road maintenance. Interesting idea though potentially that Admiral, Direct Line etc should contribute to road safety as it would be in their interests as keeps claims down..
well there was a big bmw alloy debate as they kept cracking due to the road surfaces, i doubt that any insurance company would help at all, shame as im sure the revenue involved in insurance premiums is massive!

I'd blame the cyclists... they dont pay anything yet wear the road out quite considerably... dont u think?


Sorry, I'll b serious... There r many things wrong wiv wot we pay for. Just think how many times a road, just after has been resurfaced, is dug up by various different companies and various different times when if u think about it it would make more sense if these various companies worked together and did everything (so far as they can) at the same time. Each time creating heavy traffic, closed roads, diversions for months at a time... AND the cost each time round... that would be a bigger concern to me... maybe

yes and its incredibly painful. For purely selfish reasons I wouldn't suggest u joined us there's already too many ppl on board filling everything up!


WARNING! -I have many personal issues from my daily commuting this wk - WARNING!

Question


With all of the pot holes after the snow, why do councils spend their 'under spend' at the end of the financial year on so called 'Road and Junction improvemens' (like the current one near the White Horse in Peckham) rather then filling in the bleeding holes ?

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Question

>

> With all of the pot holes after the snow, why do

> councils spend their 'under spend' at the end of

> the financial year on so called 'Road and Junction

> improvemens' (like the current one near the White

> Horse in Peckham) rather then filling in the

> bleeding holes ?


Those works have been in the pipeline for quite a while, I don't think it would be sensible to jack them in at such a late stage.


Still, the potholes have made my daily cycle commute quite a lot scarier when you have to avoid foot-deep holes whilst contending with racing vans, buses and pedestrians wandering out into Rye Lane without looking :(

i think if vans and bike riders could have a beter relationship there would be less trouble on roads , i am a motorbike rider so therefore use my mirrors, but cyclists need to try and realise we dont have as much control over a 2 ton van as 150kg bike and rider. motorbikes have power to get out of trouble. not a harsh post just think if there was a theory test for cyclists then drivers be able avoid unforseen colloisions. . i would love to ride a bike to work but my job does not permit it.

firstchoicegary Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> cyclists need to try and realise we

> dont have as much control over a 2 ton van as

> 150kg bike and rider. motorbikes have power to get

> out of trouble.


A ridiculous thing to say. If you drive with due care and attention and at a sensible speed, respecting other road users, particularly cyclists, who are the most vulnerable road users, then you'd have as much control over your 2 ton van as is necessary to avoid any collisions etc

not when they ignore my indicator signals when im clearly in front and come up the side of the van or when they ignore red lights which apply to all road users. and why are cyclists not insured? i had a bike scrape side of my brand new van with handle bars and rode off. . is this fair??? who pays for my repair? yet also if i hit a cyclist regardless of blame i will pay costs on insurance , , is this a fair deal even though we share the same roads??

Gary, you're listing a lot of complaints here about your experience of road use. You started off complaining about potholes and have now moved on to cyclists. Everyone seems to be at fault except you.

Maybe it's time to get back on that bus? (?2 for a single or ?1.10 on Oyster pre-pay).

how come cyclists do not have to a complete a theory test or know the highway code?? if they want to be safe and intergrate with motor vehicles surely they should be tested on road safety etc and be licensed like motorbikes. a 50cc moped has top speed of 30mph , similar to cyclists on a good day and they need insurance tax mot cbt . . .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would you like to rephrase this?  Your wording gives the impression that TfL is trying to expel its own employees from the country. TfL has changed nothing. The government visa rules have changed and this affects some TfL staff and their right to work in the UK.  As far as I am aware, TfL and the Mayor are working with the unions to try and keep those affected in their jobs.
    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...