Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The programme I referred to is people suing councils for tripping up, getting hit by a branch falling from a tree etc, and claiming they're doing it for 'justice'. Rubbish.

There's another thread I'm sure to be had about how the council may or may not be responsible but...


I enjoyed shouting at the telly.

What I don?t get is why people look for ways to sue their local council. Ok fine if they have been blatantly negligent and driven a lorry through you front room or something. But some troglodyte who trips down some stairs and then decides to sue the organisation to whom he pays a couple of hundred quid a month to provide him with a liveable environment thereby putting more financial pressure on the council and indirectly himself which inevitably leads to his environment being worse and him being more prone to accidents.


I?m not sure if it is because people are selfish or stupid or both.


I also have a sneaking suspicion that they do this sort of thing just to piss me off.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In younger days I have occasionally kissed the

> telly - does that count?


____________________________________________________


Only if you shouted "you frigid bitch" at it afterwards , then put the boot in



That would count




W**F

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
    • No party is willing to tackle the "elephant in the room" which is the national debt. It is costing the country circa £100 Billion ANNUALLY to service that debt. That is more than the defence and education budgets. That debt burden has to be reduced which in reality means cost cuts. That means cutting back state pensions, index-linked pensions for civil servants and others such as police, NHS etc. It means cutting back on universal credit and cutting the number of people who are claiming benefits.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...