Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In the absence of much attention being paid to the local election -- I decided to write to the candidates standing in my ward (Peckham Rye) to ask them about their views on libraries, independent local shops cycling and walking.


I'm pleased to say that three of the parties have replied and I've posted their statements to my blog.


Sadly, despite writing three times, I have had no response from the Greens. If any Green Party member is reading this perhaps they could send me a reply via a private message.


Meanwhile here are my three questions:


Libraries: Public libraries provide not just a free leisure service but a vital lifeline to those who need internet access to apply for jobs and purchase goods, support for lifelong learning and a place to study. Children especially gain enormously from being able to choose and read the books they like, giving them the opportunity to acquire the reading habit early on. In times of recession, this service becomes even more important to help people retrain and get back into employment. If elected, will you fight to defend our local libraries (Dulwich and Nunhead) from budget cuts and neglect?

?

Shops: Lordship Lane is a shining example of the success of small shops providing a unique and characterful centre for the community. If elected will you ensure that independent shops are not driven out by high rents and prevent large chains from running rough-shod over planning rules?

?

Walking and Cycling: The cycling facilities in Southwark are reasonable but there's huge room for improvement. Will you ensure that the cycle network is expanded and existing routes improved. Will you ensure that all road schemes prioritise cyclists and pedestrians over through traffic?


I hasten to add that I don't think that these three are the only or even the most important issues in the local election. I just have an interest in these three areas and wanted to make sure that local politicians at least are aware that they matter.


I'd also like to apologise to the marvellous Grove Vale Library for not mentioning them -- I only didn't because the original letter was to Peckham Rye Candidates and so was focused on facilities to the East of East of Dulwich.


East (of Dulwich)

http://www.eastofdulwich.com

East, do a search on tomchance on the forum and you'll find your answer.


The Greens are predictably and painfully underresourced. It's meant that they've had to focus their efforts in South Camberwell.


He's been pretty honest, and explained that if he could he would have committed more resource in ED but he was 'tween a rock and hard place.


It's a shame really, when on 'policies not parties' they score so highly.

I sent East a private message with the following response, which now appears on the blog:


Libraries - yes, we would fight to protect libraries from public spending cuts. Whichever of the three grey parties form the next Government, all three are committed to large cuts in public spending and locally the axe often falls first on services like libraries. Whilst access to the internet is increasingly used as an excuse for neglected or shrinking library services, the reasons you cite in addition to the relatively low level of internet access in Peckham Rye make them all the more important.


Shops - the Green Party has long campaigned to protect local independent shops. We have published an action plan for Peckham town centre (http://southwark.greenparty.org.uk/peckham) and would apply the same principles to Lordship Lane, Forest Hill Road and other smaller arcades with handfuls of shops throughout Southwark.


Walking and cycling - we would press for three simple measures: first, actually implement the council's dormant policy of providing cycle lanes and infrastructure whenever road works are carried out, extending this to also include the widening of pavements for pedestrians where there is road space; second, prioritise roads on cycle routes such as LCN 22 and 25 when filling potholes and other road maintenance; third, more consistently implement a 20mph zone across the entire borough on all residential roads and ensure the police are taking road safety more seriously.


We are, more or less as Huguenot says, focusing our resources on South Camberwell and The Lane. Sorry for the slowish reply.

Very pleased to have received Tom Chance's reply which has now appeared on my blog along with replies from all the other parties standing in my ward.


I do accept that the Green Party lacks the resources of the other parties but still think it's a shame that they can't get a volunteer to answer messages sent to the address given on their website. But this of course could be reason why we should be supporting the Greens -- they seem to need all the help they can get.


As for what I think about the other parties' responses, I may leave that for another time.




East

www.eastofdulwich.com

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Another great job from Leon - sorted a consumer unit and EICR for me last minute. Highly recommend 
    • Admin, please move this if it's in the wrong section. Can anybody recommend a reasonably local dietician (or possibly nutritionist? Not sure what the difference is). My GP has suggested I see a dietician, but there isn't one attached to the practice. I have googled, but it's very hard to tell what people may be like from an online description, and I want somebody who is properly qualified. Alternatively, please PM me if you know of people I should avoid! Thanks x
    • A vet might be able to trace its owners if it's chipped. Also I believe twb who posts on here has a mobile scanner. Poor cat.
    • If you look at the application linked to in the OP, you'll see it's a Licensing Act 2003 one, in this case for the purposes of sale by retail of alcohol and for the provision of late night refreshment: "TAKEAWAY COFFEE/ HOT SNACKS 2300-0100". IF the shop counts as a Hot Food Takeaway, then section P48 of the Southwark Plan https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf , which appears to be the latest one linked to on Southwark's site, will I presume be applied in any  planning application (Is there one?). It says: "New hot food takeaways will only be permitted where: ..... 3. The proposed location is further than 400 metres from any existing or proposed primary or secondary school’s boundary; ....." It incorporates  policy laid down in the National Planning Policy Framework, and thence the London Plan.  Over the years KFC, and others, have taken a  number of appeals against local planning authority decisions on Takeaways to the Planning Inspectorate.  Some have been allowed.  KFCs 'commentary on evidence contained in London Plan Topic Paper: Hot Food Takeaways', https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/nlp_ad_91.pdf may be of interest to some. I'm guessing it's referring to https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/london_plan_topic_paper_on_hot_food_takeaways.pdf of 2018, but haven't yet checked.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...