Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Did anyone else receive a rather bizarre A4 letter from former Labour councillor Mick Barnard, urging us to vote for one Conservative candidate and two of the labour ones?


What's going on -- was there some major spate of in-fighting in the Peckham Rye ward labour party that caused all the sitting Councillors to step down at the same time? I have to say that I thought that Labour fought a very poor campaign in this ward at least -- I had the distinct sense that they had given up from the start.


Does anyone have any inside dirt on what's been going on?


East

www.eastofdulwich.com

I received a perfectly sensible letter from him stating his opinion on voting for people and not parties. He had given up his membership of the Labour Party when he stood down from being a Councillor, and was of the best most active and useful local councillors I have known and been represented by, since I moved here 27 years ago. He really cared. So having given up his party political status he wanted to advise on individuals who would best serve us (he lives up the road from me) and our immediate area. I thought it a reasonable thing to do.

Rose,


Maybe If I knew more about Mr Barnard and shared your opinion of him, then I wouldn't have found the letter so extraordinary. I do remember writing to him a couple of times on issues I was concerned about and have to say that I didn't find his replies particularly satisfying.


That having been said, my surprise at getting the letter stems from it being written by a former member of the Labour party urging people to vote Tory. I am afraid I am quite unable to overcome my irrational Bevanite contempt for the party that gave us Thatcher and Howard. And I couldn't help but feel rather annoyed that someone with no standing in my eyes saw fit to tell me who I should vote for.


It will be interesting to see whether the vote reflects Mr Barnard's intervention in any way.

I know what you mean but he did make it clear that he was asking people to vote for the person, rather than the party they represented, because he knew them well enough to know they'd be good for the area. When / if they were MPs he would probably not suggest we vote for them. Also, indeed he is not a member of any political party anymore.

I think I owe you an apology of sort. I see from the results that more people did in fact vote for the candidates he backed including the Tory one. So Mr Barnard obviously does carry some weight in these parts.


I wonder if he might have even swung the election in Peckham Rye against the Lib Dems.

Mick's letter was kindly distributed for him by the local Conservatives - along with a glossy leaflet about Diana Atuona. An attempt to try and get one of their candidates some local credibility after zero actual campaigning on their part, and potentially win one of the three local seats for her. Of course, you wouldn't know that from Mick's letter which is written to imply he took a reasoned view after meeting all of the candidates. As one of the (defeated) candidates I can confirm Mick has never made any effort to speak to me. So, naturally was a bit peeved when reading how he'd dismissed me outright - so much for choosing an individual!


Still, while it might have a small impact on the overall vote, I don't think it effected the result. Reckon Lab would've still won without it, alas, as most local people I spoke to about it just thought it was all a bit of a bizarre intervention.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I scarcely use my ancient (1998!) non ULEZ compliant car any more, which I have had for nearly 20 years. It is presently  used mainly to take bulky  things up to my allotment or the tip, occasional weekends away,  festivals or  camping trips, and sometimes giving people lifts to and from stations. But that's mainly because I have to pay the ULEZ charge every time I use it. It has been very reliable, is  in good nick and passes its MOT every year. Now, after months without use apart from opening the door to put things into the car, a new battery bought last September is dead and won't charge 😭 I realise this is my own stupid fault for not realising that you shouldn't let a battery completely discharge, and I should have gone for a drive or charged the battery before. I have hung onto the car because I am over the age limit for car share  club type things and car hire companies (though my daughter has just found a website with car hire schemes for ancient people). Also I am not used to driving more modern cars! I looked into getting a (second hand)  replacement when ULEZ came in, and it just all seemed like too much hassle. Now I don't know whether it's worth shelling out for yet another new battery (DUH) . The one I got is still  under guarantee, but only for "manufacturing faults" and I imagine this won't apply in this case. But if I don't I will have to somehow dispose of the car, which also needs at least one tyre inflating, for which I need a working battery 😭 If you don't have a car, how do you manage, especially if like me you are very old?  And/or do you have any advice on whether I should keep the car, or if not what to do with it? 
    • LOL, no Sue, definitely Musk Turtles.
    • They will have some rationale for this, but it feels like a deliberate testing of the waters, to see how much of the park they can take, with the trackway right across the length of the whole playing fields and the new and exceedingly ugly, extended footprint. My guess is soon we will see further encroachments and extensions and even more events, from other organisations. Peckham Rye is on course to be a giant, summer-long event space, just like Brockwell Park. I have just checked Southwark Council licensing and it seems the intention is to use the Gala infrastructure to mount events, this may only the extra 'family' day but 6 days are mentioned. The Licensing Sub-Committee heard from the representative for the Applicant who advised that the purpose of the application was to present a family festival day and two live concert days to take place in Peckham Rye Park in May/June within the existing site operated by We are the Fair/Assembled Gala.  The Applicant would work in collaboration with the Peckham Festival on the events falling on the weekend after GALA. GALA normally is held on the late May Bank Holiday Weekend.
    • I have one you can have for £10? Collection from se154eg
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...