Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mrs TP Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The northern end of LL, so on a map the top ;)



So if I climb Scafell from the northern side, am I starting at the top of the path and reaching the summit at the bottom of it?!

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Isn't the roundabout at the top of Lordship

> Lane?? :-D

>

> No! It's the bottom! LL is on a hill...


LL is not on a hill, is it? Grove Lane/Dog Kennel Hill is, but not LL.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Loz Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Isn't the roundabout at the top of Lordship

> > Lane?? :-D

> >

> > No! It's the bottom! LL is on a hill...

>

> LL is not on a hill, is it? Grove Lane/Dog Kennel

> Hill is, but not LL.



Try getting on yer bike and freewheeling 'up' to the library.


Eta, from gg

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Loz Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Isn't the roundabout at the top of Lordship

> > Lane?? :-D

> >

> > No! It's the bottom! LL is on a hill...

>

> LL is not on a hill, is it? Grove Lane/Dog Kennel

> Hill is, but not LL.


Being a nerd I checked on Google earth - the Lordship Lane roundabout is 50 feet above sea level, the south east end where it becomes the south circular is 155 feet...

According to a topographic website, the elevation at the roundabout is 23m (75 ft) above sea level at the roundabout and 55m (180 ft) at the junction with Upland Road. The distance between those points is 1.75km, that gives a gradient of about 1.82:100 or 1.46:80. A 'flat' roof generally has a gradient of 1:80.


That's hardly a 'hill'. It barely rates as a 'gentle incline'.


ETA: I think I just out-nerded rendelharris

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> According to a topographic website, the elevation

> at the roundabout is 23m (75 ft) above sea level

> at the roundabout and 55m (180 ft) at the junction

> with Upland Road. The distance between those

> points is 1.75km, that gives a gradient of about

> 1.82:100 or 1.46:80. A 'flat' roof generally has a

> gradient of 1:80.

>

> That's hardly a 'hill'. It barely rates as a

> 'gentle incline'.

>

> ETA: I think I just out-nerded rendelharris


That's nothing to be proud of, you know, more worried about...the thing that makes LL a bugger to ride up (or down, as you wish) is that though there's theoretically a gentle slope from start to finish it's really mainly flattish but with two buggering steep bits. They certainly feel like hills.

Either way one thing to fix at that roundabout to get folk to use indicators - I've just seen a bump when someone turning right from the north end of Lordship Lane took the left hand lane into the junction and then made a wide sweep right and hit someone who thought, I guess, that the person from the Lordship lane side was going towards East Dulwich station

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> though there's theoretically a gentle slope from start to

> finish it's really mainly flattish but with two

> buggering steep bits. They certainly feel like hills.


This! Big hill! Down.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Top is the bit facing central London (or

> Buckingham palace) ;)


Close but Central London is Eleanor's Cross outside Charing Cross Railway Station.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/staticarchive/a45a40f1a26bdfa4169986bb12d9f1a0a428f1e3.jpg


Foxy


P.S. The roundabout is at the Bottom of Lordship Lane :)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Close but Central London is Eleanor's Cross

> outside Charing Cross Railway Station.

>

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/staticarchive/a45a40f1a26bdfa

> 4169986bb12d9f1a0a428f1e3.jpg

>


In the spirit of outnerding which I'm very pleased to see on this thread, the centre of London isn't in fact Eleanor's Cross outside Charing Cross, which is a replica of the original, built in 1863. The original Eleanor's Cross stood at the top of Whitehall where the statue of Charles I is now; if you look carefully around there you'll find a plaque marking the original site and stating that all London distances are to measured from there.

Rendelharris,

Thanks, I also had believed that distances were measured from the cross in front of Charing Cross Station, but your answer still leaves me with a little confusion. You say that the original Eleanor's Cross stood at the "top" of Whitehall. I assume by "top" you mean the end at which the Cross stood.


Which end of Whitehall is that?

MarkT

No idea what is right, I call it the bottom by the roundabout, also call the end of rye lane by Tesco and Barclays the bottom!!

However, as to the original thread, I picked up the bricks that had been left in the road and lumped them up onto the grass of the roundabout. Always worried about bikes and moter vehicles hitting these and causing a bigger accident!!!

Actually, second Tuesday in a row I've done this!!!

Hope Southwark council collect them and fix it soon

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > Close but Central London is Eleanor's Cross

> > outside Charing Cross Railway Station.

> >

> >

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/staticarchive/a45a40f1a26bdfa

>

> > 4169986bb12d9f1a0a428f1e3.jpg

> >

>

> In the spirit of outnerding which I'm very pleased

> to see on this thread, the centre of London isn't

> in fact Eleanor's Cross outside Charing Cross,

> which is a replica of the original, built in 1863.

> The original Eleanor's Cross stood at the top of

> Whitehall where the statue of Charles I is now; if

> you look carefully around there you'll find a

> plaque marking the original site and stating that

> all London distances are to measured from there.


Yes I realised it had been moved. From the same article that I posted..


Indeed I think you are correct. I should of read further down I just had it in my head It was the Charing Cross Station.


Fair play.


Foxy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
    • I always like Redemptions coffee though I've not visted for awhile..Romeo Jones was always my 1st choice for takeout Coffee Redemption 2nd. What IS with all these independent Yoga and Pilates Studios? Theres one on London Rd in Forest Hill (Mind) thats recently opened and then theres the Pilates place thats opened on North X Road. I looked at the prices of the one on NorthX road and was frankly shocked at how expensive it is, The FH one is slightly less.  Made me decide to stick with classes in The local authority gym
    • Dulwich Village update: The old DVillage location is (again?) under offer. The storefront next to the new grocer is going to open as a yoga and pilates studio...the name of which I've forgotten. 🤦‍♂️  Megan's is starting to push its takeaway coffee and cannibalise some of Redemption Coffee's market share. Is Megan's struggling? It's quite a big restaurant they have and rent cant be cheap. The reinventing of the Megan's branch on Lordship Lane as Ollie's seems to have stalled. And Redemption is looking a bit tired these days...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...