Jump to content

Recommended Posts

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You can't combine the NASUWT and the NUT- teachers

> specifically avoid the NUT because they are so

> militant and so join the other unions (ATL, Voice

> (formerly P.A.T- 20,000 members and a no-strike

> policy) because ALL teachers need Union support

> for one reason or another.


It's funny how a union is called militant for defending the rights of teachers and children, but nobody calls a government militant for slashing education budgets, dicking around with the curriculum on ideological grounds and rejigging the educational landscape so their pals can start taking massive profits from it (Lord Peckham et al). Worth noting the NUT didn't strike between 1987 and 2008 and that teacher strikes are still very rare, but of course the second teachers do strike, after protracted attempts to engage the government in dialogue and being met with nothing but stonewalling, they're instantly accused of being loony left militants.

You cannot combine both trade unions just to get a result that suits your argument

22.47% voted to go on strike

75.51% exercised their freedom not to vote


Total electorate Dulwich & West Norwood 113,754

Voter Turnout 51,362

Helen Hayes 27,772

% of electorate that voted for her 24.41%

Much the same for most MPs but no one claims they are not legitimately elected


Abstension = acceptance of result

Lordship 516 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You cannot combine both trade unions just to get a

> result that suits your argument

> 22.47% voted to go on strike

> 75.51% exercised their freedom not to vote

>

> Total electorate Dulwich & West Norwood 113,754

> Voter Turnout 51,362

> Helen Hayes 27,772

> % of electorate that voted for her 24.41%

> Much the same for most MPs but no one claims they

> are not legitimately elected

>

> Abstension = acceptance of result


I'll file that under "points I wish I'd thought of making" - nice one.

It is important to understand what the strike (which yes, was called for by over 90% of those who voted) is for.


It is a last ditch protest against the Education Bill, directed at a government which ISN'T LISTENING.


A good place to start to read about the Bill is here: https://www.teachers.org.uk/campaigns/white-paper


Enough is enough!


I have three children in state education and my family is affected by this strike. But i question who in their right mind would be standing with this Tory government against the people who actually devote their working week to teaching and caring for our young children.


Support our teachers. Save your anger for the government.

I'm with Rendel on this one. I never quite understand the special level of ire reserved for teachers striking compared to other professions (even doctors).


I think a large part of it is just that people have a sense of entitlement and school is free childcare which has no business being disrupted.



A strike that causes no disruption is not worth doing. The point is to cause disruption because that is the only way to be heard.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> different issue - crossing picket lines; too much

> hassle; wrath of colleagues (interesting piece in

> the Spectator recently about what it's like to be

> an out Tory teacher recently, answer frightening

> and damaging to your career prospects).


You are absolutely right on that - teachers may well feel intimidated into not crossing a picket line even if they didn't support the strike. But if they felt like that, why didn't they vote down the strike in the secret ballot they were offered? As Lordship 516 pointed out, abstention=acceptance of result. Unless universal participation in ballots is made law then the results can only be taken from those who bothered to vote.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I personally, just lost respect as this is not the time to.disrupt hospitals and put additional strain on stretched resources.  BBC News - Doctors vote to go ahead with this week's five-day strike https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c246dnyjylqo
    • Most people with pets would not bring either the pets or fireworks into their day to day conversations. Are you suggesting that only "timid" pets are scared by fireworks? What evidence do you have for that, exactly?  Or are you equating being scared of fireworks with being "timid"? Firework noise is not a noise that "comes with normal city living" ! What a very strange thing to say!
    • Well, I know a lot of people in London with pets and I've never heard any of them complain about fireworks.  Maybe what's not ok is keeping timid animals in a metropolis when they are scared of the noises that come with normal city living.
    • We git a ticket when we tried to park there to watch the fireworks.  Anyways we didn't even get a space and so we didn't actually park.  But we got a penalty notice.  We just paid up.  And we won't be taking our car their ever again.  You probably needed a Southwark council visitors permit.  I imagine it would have needed to be booked online B4 or by the end of the day that you parked. Beat thing to do is contact Southwark Council Estate parking to clarify the situation.   I hope your freebie was worth the value of your penalty.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...