Jump to content

Recommended Posts

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You can't combine the NASUWT and the NUT- teachers

> specifically avoid the NUT because they are so

> militant and so join the other unions (ATL, Voice

> (formerly P.A.T- 20,000 members and a no-strike

> policy) because ALL teachers need Union support

> for one reason or another.


It's funny how a union is called militant for defending the rights of teachers and children, but nobody calls a government militant for slashing education budgets, dicking around with the curriculum on ideological grounds and rejigging the educational landscape so their pals can start taking massive profits from it (Lord Peckham et al). Worth noting the NUT didn't strike between 1987 and 2008 and that teacher strikes are still very rare, but of course the second teachers do strike, after protracted attempts to engage the government in dialogue and being met with nothing but stonewalling, they're instantly accused of being loony left militants.

You cannot combine both trade unions just to get a result that suits your argument

22.47% voted to go on strike

75.51% exercised their freedom not to vote


Total electorate Dulwich & West Norwood 113,754

Voter Turnout 51,362

Helen Hayes 27,772

% of electorate that voted for her 24.41%

Much the same for most MPs but no one claims they are not legitimately elected


Abstension = acceptance of result

Lordship 516 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You cannot combine both trade unions just to get a

> result that suits your argument

> 22.47% voted to go on strike

> 75.51% exercised their freedom not to vote

>

> Total electorate Dulwich & West Norwood 113,754

> Voter Turnout 51,362

> Helen Hayes 27,772

> % of electorate that voted for her 24.41%

> Much the same for most MPs but no one claims they

> are not legitimately elected

>

> Abstension = acceptance of result


I'll file that under "points I wish I'd thought of making" - nice one.

It is important to understand what the strike (which yes, was called for by over 90% of those who voted) is for.


It is a last ditch protest against the Education Bill, directed at a government which ISN'T LISTENING.


A good place to start to read about the Bill is here: https://www.teachers.org.uk/campaigns/white-paper


Enough is enough!


I have three children in state education and my family is affected by this strike. But i question who in their right mind would be standing with this Tory government against the people who actually devote their working week to teaching and caring for our young children.


Support our teachers. Save your anger for the government.

I'm with Rendel on this one. I never quite understand the special level of ire reserved for teachers striking compared to other professions (even doctors).


I think a large part of it is just that people have a sense of entitlement and school is free childcare which has no business being disrupted.



A strike that causes no disruption is not worth doing. The point is to cause disruption because that is the only way to be heard.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> different issue - crossing picket lines; too much

> hassle; wrath of colleagues (interesting piece in

> the Spectator recently about what it's like to be

> an out Tory teacher recently, answer frightening

> and damaging to your career prospects).


You are absolutely right on that - teachers may well feel intimidated into not crossing a picket line even if they didn't support the strike. But if they felt like that, why didn't they vote down the strike in the secret ballot they were offered? As Lordship 516 pointed out, abstention=acceptance of result. Unless universal participation in ballots is made law then the results can only be taken from those who bothered to vote.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just to warn anyone thinking of employing or engaging Chris and Anna Richmond, that nothing has changed.  The accounts above from others are all too familiar.  A job that we were told would take between 6-8 months is now entering its 23rd month.  They have taken enormous amounts of money from us, finished nothing, and the quality of the work that they have delivered is poor to substandard.  They take no responsibility themselves - there are endless excuses and everything is someone else's fault.  They do not care about the impact that their actions have on anyone else.   They are, at best, chaotic. They have not delivered as the designers or project managers that they claim to be. They are rarely on site to monitor the progress or quality of the job that is being delivered and they and manage their largely non-English speaking workforce by WhatsApp and Google translate.  There has been little evidence that they employ the skilled tradespeople needed to lay tiles, install bathrooms and kitchens, decorate and complete to the standard that we have paid for.  I cannot stress enough, that if you are currently in discussion with Anna and Chris Richmond about a future job or have paid them money up front for a job that they have slipped in delivering, to quit while you are ahead.  Things won't get better.
    • Hi All, I’d like to recommend Aaron Manser, who several others on this forum have also used. Aaron is an excellent plasterer, and has just finished a complicated piece of plastering work for me, including a large expanse of ceiling. His work has been of the highest quality, his attention to detail is exceptional, and he’s also very quick, and tidy too. As an added bonus he has a lovely singing voice. Happy to provide any photos of the work he has done. This is the third time over the past few years I’ve had Aaron back. Aaron Manser - 07773 410661 Regards, Damien
    • I really have to smile as I was the one, years ago who posted about what Gala was.. had not a clue, but drove and drive regularly. Felt such a fool at the time but wow, years later post still comes up.. with comments. Still don’t understand why a lot of park is cordoned off and glad not a resident overlooking park.. must be so noisy but now dates have been kindly supplied, those that don’t want to chill and listen to music in their flats/houses can up sticks and explore UK or abroad. Totally understand that in a built up area and millions in London, music events take place all over the capital to allow access to all.  Brockwell  Park, Dulwich Park, don’t hear anything going on in or around Telegraph Hill or indeed Horniman Gardens.. Crystal Palace I believe do their own thing.  Do these events , clearly charge, provide their own insurance, public liability, crowd control, first aiders, security and policing? Rubbish clearance etc  
    • Personally I think the second weekend has always been a tactical ploy with no real intention of going ahead with it. The council then turn it down (saying they have listened to us, which of course they haven’t) and announce that they will only license one weekend. GALA get the result that they want - job done. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the council even suggested this ploy, they are so desperate to keep the event.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...