Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Great - I'll look too!!


I just noticed this on referendum petition, we might need to consider this in the wording if we do have to do anything:


"The Committee has decided to defer its decision on this petition until the Government Digital Service has done all it can to verify the signatures on the petition. We have already had to remove 77,000 fraudulent signatures. The Committee wishes to make clear that, although it may choose to schedule a debate on this petition in due course, it only has the power to schedule debates in Westminster Hall ? the second debating chamber of the House of Commons. Debates in Westminster Hall do not have the power to change the law, and could not trigger a second referendum."

muffins78 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I found this one

>

> https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/133540

>

> Happy, very happy to sign a local one too!!


Thanks Muffin - already signed & confirmed


I also started a new thread so it will get more exposure

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> muffins78 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So now to get sharing this one :)

> >

> > I signed and it's confirmed too!!

> >

> > Maybe needs new thread - subject line on this

> is

> > misleading!!

>

>

> The subject line on this thread could be edited?


Only by the OP.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > muffins78 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > So now to get sharing this one :)

> > >

> > > I signed and it's confirmed too!!

> > >

> > > Maybe needs new thread - subject line on this

> > is

> > > misleading!!

> >


> >

> > The subject line on this thread could be

> edited?


>

> Only by the OP.


Yes, so the OP could edit it? Only a suggestion.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Politics is a nasty business and very vindictive at times - especially when internal party politics are concerned. Perhaps this is revenge for the leadership challenge and was being served cold. I do hope Cllr McAsh has understanding employers and can get his job back if that part of the story is true.
    • The Leader of the Council gets a larger Special Responsibility Allowance than plain Cabinet members: £58,427 in 2023-24, rather than somewhere in the £30k+ range.  See https://www.southwark.gov.uk/about-council/councillors-and-mps/councillors/allowances, which includes links to full tables of payments made to all councillors for the past seven years.  There's a list of Cabinet members at https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/mgCommitteeMailingList.aspx?ID=302
    • The list of projects on the Railway Gazette link talks about “Peckham Rye congestion relief “ being delayed; is this the same as the redevelopment of the square in front?  Or is it internal changes to the station? Is there separate funding for the two or is it all one project?
    • This doesn't sound to promising Peckham Rye station upgrade sees funding axed by government - Murky Depths and Mixed news for rail as government backs transport infrastucture projects | Rail Business UK | Railway Gazette International Sounds like the project has been delayed / postponed.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...