Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This article digs deeper into who is most likely to have voted 'Leave'.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-36803544


To some extent it debunks the theory that this was a vote pitching the wealthy against the impoverished and the city dweller against the resident of the small town. This ties in with my own experience, explaining the aristocratic Chelsea lady and the retired East Anglian bank manager who I know to have voted 'Leave'.


My hope is that the new PM does not closely espouse the 'traditional values' mentioned in this article.


(post script - and if you look at the full breadth of what 'traditional values' incorporates - an attachment to the past, rather than moving forward, being the chief identifier - it applies as much to 'die hard' leftists as to those with 'right wing' sensibilities.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • 🤣 re your mystic powers! Didn't want to just put a 🤣 on your post in case people thought I was laughing because the cat had been found!
    • Hopefully, they won't wash the changing room mats poolside in future so the filters won't be overworked keeping the water clean!!!
    • I agree with your sentiment, however you are mistaken about the Dulwich Estate. Their sole purpose is to make as much money as possible to give to the schools they support, as well as the almshouses and other historical buildings. They do not care about social housing (except subsidised housing for teachers of the schools), refreshing the area, low-rent studios, charming but affordable pub, etc. While they are a charity, their purpose is very constrained/focused and whatever they do with this site, it has to make money for them. It's not that they're being nasty or stingy, it's just what their statutes tell them they have to do. Note that I am not defending them, but knowing the above helps understand why they do what they do, even if sometimes it seems to go against the wishes of the local community. They are not answerable to the local community, and their only oversight is the charity commission and the courts. And of course, like all bureaucracies (esp those with limited oversight), they look after themselves very well. 
    • Perhaps responses are made by DM?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...