Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Our daughter (23 months old) has occasionally had drops of blood on her pillow over the past few months, clearly mixed with saliva so it must come from her mouth. She doesn't hit her face/mouth against the sides of the bed or anything like that, she's bruise free, and I've seen a little wound on the inside of her cheek so it seems to come from a small internal injury.


Has anyone heard of sleeping toddlers sucking on their cheeks so hard that they bleed? She never seems to suck on her cheeks when awake (and her poo isn't dark so I doubt she swallows any blood while awake). Or would she be chewing on her cheeks with her super sharp toddler molars (again, never noticed her doing this while awake)? Or is this blood from teething (i.e. from the gums)? The latter would surprise me as it's happened more often than teeth have actually come through.


Does anyone have experience with this?


She never seems in pain, doesn't cry at night but the blood on her pillow looks a bit spooky.

Yes, this happened to my boy, sometimes, when he was teething -- I asked around at the time and there was about one or two other Mums that had seen this too for the same reason but most hadn;t experienced this. His teeth seemed to pop through very fast and often I could see blood at the base of the cut teeth. He also didn;t seem bothered by it...hope that helps xx
Definitely does help to know we're not the only ones! Her canines are coming through and she does salivate a lot but she never ever complains of pain so it's easy to forget it could "simply" be the gums themselves.
  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Let them go bust.  Enact emergency legislation to ensure that the water still flows and the rest of the network operates. Why should we care what happens to the investors.  Have no idea could or would this work, and where next. And the workers will still be needed whoever runs the show.
    • I think you might mean 'repossession' rather than 'reprocessing'.  
    • I think this is a bit of a myth.  It's true that some of the current owners are pension funds (chiefly the Ontario Universities') but they're global outfits, big enough to know what they're about. As for ordinary UK pension funds, they mostly invest in publicly-tradeable stocks, which Thames no longer is (it's a private limited company, not a PLC), so even those that lazily track the markets by buying everything in the index won't be exposed as Thames isn't in any index. In other words, it's a lot less complicated than Thames, the Government or innumerable consultancies and PR outfits would like you to believe. In case, incidentally, the idea of a cooperative offends any delicate Thatcherite sensibilities, I'd argue that it fits the Thatcherite vision of a stakeholding democracy much better than selling tradeable shares to the public very cheaply. The public, despite their blessable cottons, are too easily tempted by the small but easy win (which is how they sold off their own building societies, preparing the ground for the credit crunch and then the crash) and, as became obvious after every privatisation before or since, their modest stakes inevitably end up in the hands of financial engineers whose only priority is to siphon off the assets and leave the husk to either go bankrupt or get "rescued" by the taxpayers (who thus get to pay twice for nothing). The root of that is the concept of "limited liability" which makes it all possible, but even the most nauseating free-market optimist would struggle to predict the demise of that.  
    • Repossession? Oh no, that's really sad 😢 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...