Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just mentioned this on another thread but thought it worthwhile bringing it to wider attention (apologies if it's old news, I only noticed when I rode through there last weekend): Greenwich foot tunnel, where cycling was previously banned, now has a very funky new system in place which automatically counts the number of pedestrians in the tunnel and allows cycling when it's relatively empty. If it's allowed the new sign reads "Please consider pedestrians," if too crowded "No cycling." One can still push a bike through at any time, obviously.


Could be of interest to those commuting to Canary Wharf and environs?


I must applaud this common sense shared use approach from Greenwich council, very refreshing instead of the usual divisive them vs us approach.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wow - if only we could have a more sensible and

> proportionate approach elsewhere eg - there are no

> pedestrians at the lights, you can cycle throughh.

> That will get you Daily Mail readers all angry.


Hornets' nest...poking...but agree. They're doing it in Paris now - cyclists can turn right on red and go straight on at T-junctions against the lights - and according to my mates there (both drivers and cyclists) it's working very well. Though oddly enough, given the reputation of French drivers, when I cycle in Paris I always find them much more courteous than London drivers. Lots more room on the boulevards of course, and their system of cycle lanes is way ahead of ours.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When I used to walk through the cyclists used to

> 'ride'

> with one foot on the floor one on the pedal -

> technically

> they were not riding.


Yes I've seen that (didn't do it honest - though I would ride through at 6.30 Sunday morning if it was completely empty) - not recommended, just as dangerous as riding but with way less balance and ability to brake in a straight line.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So... you saw them then? In spite of them having no lights (and presumably being dressed in all black / coming out of nowhere / insert any other standard anti-cyclist trope here). I've long thought that the best way of being visible as a cyclist is to wear all black, have no lights and to ride on the pavement (or jump red lights). Not only does literally *everyone* see you, they pop onto the local forum to complain about you! On the other hand if you dress in all yellow and get T-boned, the driver will still manage to say "sorry mate, I didn't see you". 😉
    • Fine dude - you do you. I dont think you have the slightest interest in the BBC (whereas clearly HeadNun dos) other than its elimination.  If it made these mistakes against starmer/davey/greens whoever I doubt you would get as upset. It’s all very “bring a pen to Brexit referendum because they can rub out pencil  votes” (“but strafe!! Dave hasn’t said any of these things on here  and if you suggest he does elsewhere you have no proof!”  This is true! And yet here we are ) I’ll ask again. Why do you think lowe said foreigner and domestic.  Instead of just “criminals”?
    • The number of cyclists that are not wearing front and rear lights, or high visibility clothes is unreal. Add to that dangerous weaving in and out, especially on this weather. So selfish, irresponsible and dangerous. We’re just tracking a bus route through Camberwell and have seen too many cyclists inadequately dressed and breaking the law.  
    • So the standards you hold the BBC to are the "several people" are also incompetent. Great. Half a million people last year stopped paying the licence fee because of those standards.    The Trump story came out of an internal BBC memo. But it's not just Trump and Lowe and other politicians you don't happen to agree with where their standards have fallen way below what licence payers are entitled to. There are a litany of failures covered by that memo, covering such broad ranging subjects as Israel/Hams, Transgender issues, Racism, Immigration, and oversimplified or distorted narratives on historical content. It's a deep rooted problem that needs solving immediately and yesterday's follow on blunder instills no confidence. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...