Jump to content

Part time nanny and share family wanted Nov 2016


Recommended Posts

We are a family living in Crofton Park looking for a live-out nanny to take sole charge of our baby son, who will be aged 13 months, on a part-time basis from November 2016. The nanny will be required to work 2.5 or 3 days a week and be willing to be part of a nanny share (if not already) with another family in the locality (yet to be identified). There is some flexibility as to the exact hours / working pattern of days at this time. For the first month the nanny will only be needed for 2 days a week. From January the full hours will be available.


The nanny needs to be Ofsted registered or willing to become registered for the purpose of childcare vouchers.


We are looking for a nanny who genuinely enjoys children and is thoughtful and sensitive about how a child sees and experiences their world. We are looking for a patient, creative, responsible and caring individual with experience with the age-group, but who can also work flexibly to fit in with the individual needs of the child in their care. The nanny must be able to provide a warm and safe relationship for children, to have a sense of fun and enjoy the outdoors. We would like our child to be taken to activities where he can socialise with other children. Being able to prepare healthy food is important.


Please contact me if you have any questions or if you are interested in the position or if you are a family looking for a Nannyshare.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...