Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,

a bit of a bizarre question here,but I have my parents coming to visit in November for the birth of my second child and due to lack of space and increasing number of babies we won't be able to put them up. Hotels are quite pricey and I was wondering if anyone knows of any holiday lets ( 2 weeks) that might be available locally. We are baed in Honor Oak. I woud really appreciate some help here. I would hate it if they had to stay home and miss their grandchild's birth!


Thanks xx

depends on the budget -


http://www.sjguesthouse.co.uk/index.htm


premier inns are ?29 per night if booked in advance - closest may be in greenwich


Have heard this accomodation recommended a few years ago when there was a local wedding

It's in Canadian Avenue in catford and seems quite busy and popular and has parking


Glenthurston Holiday Apartments - www.londonselfcatering.co.uk

27 Canadian Avenue, London - 020 8690 3092

4 reviews, directions, and more ?



Harefield - www.londonselfcatering.net

29 Canadian Avenue, london - 020 8690 3992


This B&B in Beckenham looks nice

http://langleypark.yolasite.com/


or closer to the time could advertise to see what's available locally

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Has anyone from the school commented? Have they said why? Is it a fresh start? Is it that Grove in the name may have connotations of wealth and they want to attract more applicants from a wider area? Is that it currently is linked to the DKH Estate? 
    • As you quite rightly say a sample of 500 is extremely  small. (actually unrepresentative in the scheme of things) Now corbyn has his own party or should that be Party, it'll be interesting to see if it is merely a "think tank" or if it contests seats and then if they win any and if they chase currently held seats by Labour. It'll be even more amusing if it unseats current Labour Ministers though.   
    • First of all, conversations with people who aren't Corbyn supporters are obviously going to tell you why those people didn't vote for him, aren't they? Second (and I don't know why I have to keep on saying this) the electoral system worked against him in terms of seats lost. If you look at the actual numbers of votes per party, yes Labour was behind, but not by as much as it appeared if just seats were counted. Thirdly, that poll was of "nearly 500" people who stopped voting Labour. That's not a very big sample, is it? Of those, 35% said it was because of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership (i.e. 65% had other reasons). Even upping the numbers to  500 people, 35% is 175. 10,269,051  people did actually vote Labour in that election. It's a long time since I used statistics for anything, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think anything you have said is "evidence"!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...