Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ultimately, Cameron's legacy is a lost decade economically, a much more polarised and divided society and a disastrous gamble on our future which he lost. I think the future will judge him, Osborne and boris (and the system of privilege which made their chumocracy possible), very badly.
the lost decade is a myth - our growth has been way above average to most big developed economies; our employment is stellar compared to southern Europe especially - hence there being plenty of them in our country working and the political pressure that has bought (and they are very welcome by me before people start jumping about screaming). If we are such a basket case why have we created most of the jobs in Europe in the past few years? France? Spain? Italy? their economies booming? The polarisations was there before and just a much of a legacy of the Labour government - hence the incomprehensibility of many that 52% voted Brexit. I preferred the coalition to the Tory govt - they did a good job in almost impossible conditions and the Liberal Democrats got no thanks for it - mainly thanks to the screaming hate filled left. My view is a referendum would have come one way or the other at some point quite soon too. I think the irellevant crap about Privilege undermined Cameron & Osbourne - and you are about to see a much more small minded , parochial, inward looking, illiberal govt than the one the Eton lot gave us.....
I agree with you quids re. the lib dens and that Mays government are incredibly backwards looking. But the Eton boys just saw the crash as an opportunity to carry on Thatchers legacy and roll back the state further, seemingly oblivious or unconcerned with warnings that it would halt the recovery and prolong the time needed to reduce the deficit. They were not serious people IMO, a Fleet Street hack and a PR man and they've done a lot of damage as a result. They wouldn't have got near the top jobs they did had they come from different backgrounds and so their journey to the top offices I'd relevant.
The scary thing is that I'm not quite sure where the adults have all gone. Our politics is in a terrible mess. Personally, I think our best (though slim) hope of returning a bit of seriousness into public life is press and voting reform... Two areas btw that Cameron had a unique opportunity to address but where again he roundly failed.
I agree rahrahrah. I too have been left wondering what happened to the 'adults'. My hope of a return to balance and seriousness derives either from the Lib Dems being rejuvenated or from a new centrist party emerging from the remains of Labour. I suspect TM may have done enough to stop her own centrist MPs from defecting to a new 'centrist' home. But who knows, if a suitable alternative emerged they might make the move.

Agree with that too. Add with the UKIP fight and you really do wonder where the grown ups are. This is perhaps also the effect of coalition and slim majorities too though. All parties are in a state of confusion of how to get that all important majority of government. The Libdems are chasing their losses. Only the SNP are in the ascendancy, but there are signs they too have peaked.


For too long now, the main parties have to sought to reflect what they think the people want to get elected - hence all those focus groups. Maybe Corbyn is right, that it is time for bold, well thought out policy, for the good of society (rather than the individual) again - even if he personally is missing the mark on what that policy needs to be.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...