Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There were several break ins at Overhill Road on Saturday September 24th around 2pm. Here are some photos of the thief from CCTV. (Photo 1 & 2)


There was another thief who was looking for an opportunity on Tuesday September 27th around 12:30. (Photo 3)


Please be aware of these individuals. If you recognise any of these thieves, please contact the police.

Thank you very much for removing the photos. I appreciate your concern regarding the legal process.


Just to be clear that the thief who was caught taking a black backpack and a plastic bag wasn't an "alleged" thief. He was the thief as he clearly had our neighbours backpack, besides another resident saw him running out from the building.


One of the resident of our building saw another black guy filming our building with his mobile phone this morning. We are sure that this is an organised crime. They are observing us. We really hope that the police does something to stop these crimes.

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've removed the photos as it may affect the legal

> process.



A photo on this forum is not going to prejudice a trial. I mean, apart from anything else, there is no trial and nothing to be sub judice yet. Taking the photo down does mean that witnesses might be missed, though.

  • Administrator

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> A photo on this forum is not going to prejudice a trial.


I said "the legal process" not "a trial", and that is an assumption that I'm not willing to believe. I would rather these people caught and convicted than caught and freed on a technicality. If there was a request for witnesses who may have seen these people then fine, perhaps the original poster would like to repost/edit the original message after advice from the police on how best to do it. Perhaps the original poster would like to repost the photos too.

P.O.U.S.theWonderCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Indeed. The reference should also be to "alleged"

> thieves.


I noticed that boy that got punched twice is an 'alleged victim'


I remember faking football fights as a boy though ;)

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> A photo on this forum is not going to prejudice a

> trial. I mean, apart from anything else, there is

> no trial and nothing to be sub judice yet. Taking

> the photo down does mean that witnesses might be

> missed, though.


I think you're absolutely right - however if a picture is posted of an innocent person that could open the forum up to actions for defamation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
    • Hello! I'm looking for a talented, affordable people photographer to do headshots for my start up's website, for 4 people. If you're keen I'd love to see examples of your work please. Many thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...