Jump to content

SOLD ? Baby carrier Beco Butterfly 2 ?35


Recommended Posts

Excellent condition! We've only ever used it a handful of times.

(RRP ?75-80)


Collection from Forest Hill or can post for an additional ?5.

Thanks for looking!


Product information (from Amazon)

? Comfortably carry your baby in front in the Beco Butterfly, or easily wear your baby on your back. Great for newborns all the way up to 45 pounds.

? Not bulky like the Ergo or frame carriers, the slim-fitting Beco enables you get your baby on your back as easily as slipping on a backpack.

? Padded waistband and shoulder straps provide luxurious comfort. Two-shouldered support is ergonomically superior to one-shouldered carriers.

? The Beco Butterfly has a handy removable sleeping hood to support a head of a napping child. It can be also used as protection from sun, rain or snow, although it is not waterproof. The sleeping hood is stored in a pocket on the waist belt, and can be used in front and back carry.






 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...