Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sorry - i know there are millions of threads about nursery - seems to confuse people other than me! I am due in October and we are planning to be able to share the childcare between us until he is 1 which would take us to October 2011. After that point - I will be back at work and we are thinking about an aupair/ nanny share from 1-2.


After age 2, we'd like to put him in a nursery and went today to see the Mothergoose Nursery on Uplands road which seemed really nice.


so - we definitely need to try & secure a place from about Sept 2012 - do you think we'd be safe just signing up for 1 nursery given that this is still a long way away - or would you recommend putting your name down and a few places just in case?


Also - I'm wondering if we should also try & put our names on a waiting list for sometime around January 2012 just in case the idea of a nanny share/ au pair doesn't work out?


Any advice?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12637-nursery-im-confused/
Share on other sites

i would see what nursery you like first and then ask. with this much notice i would have thought you would be fine. an au pair does not look after babies sole care so you would be looking at a nanny/ share, you might want to look at the costs of these options now while you have the energy!!

Saila - had you paid anything? The place we went to see asks for an application and a small deposit to hold your name on the waiting list - I assume this secures your place?


In terms of au pairs not being able to take care of babies - who sets those rules? I was an au pair for a 4 month old and it was a great experience?

There's government legislation that says you can't look after a baby without qualifications for more than 3 hours.. or something like that. someone else on here will know more than me.


I didn't pay a deposit.. they didn't ask for one? but it was a state nursery so perhaps they don't give you that option?

Maybe the private ones do. Anyway, we went for a nannyshare in the end.

if you go to any of the au pair web sites they say this is the rule. of course privately you can do what you like. BUt when you think about it would you hand your baby over to an untrained person whose first language was not english and who can only do 25 hours a week and given opportunity to go to language school? Some people call themselve au pair plus which means they have experience and are a bit older check our au pair world on the internet. Some au pairs are completley abused in this country and abroad and it makes me so mad as I have had them crying in my kitchen many a time by parents using them as very cheap labour.

Saila Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's government legislation that says you can't

> look after a baby without qualifications for more

> than 3 hours.. or something like that. someone

> else on here will know more than me.


I don't think so.. I think someone caring for your children in your home requires no qualifications, but a minder in their own home needs to be registered. There is prob some rule re immigration for non EU aupairs though.

Saila Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> i didn't realise that if it was in your own home

> you didn't need to be ofsted registered?

>

> how confusing

>

> i always thought that there was this rule (3 hours

> or somehting) to do with those who aren't

> registered, at home or not.

>

> but i'm probably wrong



Have a look at the exemptions

You do not have to register with us in the following cases.


1 If you care for children who are aged eight and over.


2 If you provide care where a child does not stay with you for more than two hours a day, even if your childcare service is open for longer than two hours.


3 If you only care for a child or children aged under eight who you are related to. A relative means a grandparent, aunt, uncle, brother or sister of a child (or half-brother or sister) or someone you are related to through marriage or civil partnership.


4 If you care for children aged under eight on domestic premises as a childminder without receiving any payment or reward for your services. Domestic premises can be your own home or someone else?s home.


5 If you are a foster carer for the children.


6 If you only care for the children of one or more friends in your own home or someone else?s home and no money changes hands, including money to pay for things like electricity and food.


7 If you provide care for children in their own home. This includes caring for children of up to two sets of parents completely or mainly in one or both sets of parents? homes. However, you need to register as a childminder if you look after the children of three sets of parents in any or all of the parents? homes.


8 If you only provide care between 6pm and 2am on domestic premises (babysitting arrangements). Domestic premises can be your own home or someone else?s home.


9 If you are providing a home-education arrangement where a child of school age receives full-time education outside school, and is partly or completely taught by a person other than a parent of the child. Care provided to the child is incidental to (not the main focus of) the education offered.


10 If you provide no more than two activities from the following list.

 School study support or homework support

 Sport

 Performing arts

 Arts and crafts

 Religious, cultural or language study

This only applies if you care for children who are aged three and over, and you do not care for children aged under five for more than four hours in any one day. Any care provided is incidental (not the main focus of) to the provision.


11 If you provide care as part of your organisation?s activities in any of the following places.

 A children?s home

 A care home

 A hospital in which a child is a patient

 A residential family centre

 A young offenders institution or secure training centre


12 If you are a school that provides education or care for children aged three and over, where at least one child being cared for is a pupil of the school. Children who are two years old when they start school but are three by the end of their first term at school (known as rising threes), may count as age three when deciding whether you need to register.


13 If you care for children under eight for four hours or less each day and the care is for the convenience of parents who plan to stay on the premises where you are providing care or within the immediate area. This type of provision has no long-term commitment to provide care for children ? for example, a shoppers? cr?che, a cr?che attached to a sports centre or adult learning centre, or an exhibition ? and covers services where children do not necessarily attend every day.


14 If you provide an open access scheme for children. An open access scheme allows children not in the early years age group (see note 1 below) to leave on their own. Childminders are not allowed to provide an open access scheme.

1 The early years age group is children aged from birth until the 31 August following their fifth birthday who go to early years settings that deliver the Early Years Foundation Stage.


15 If you care for children under eight from specific premises for 14 days or less in any year, and you let us know in writing at least 14 days before starting the service.


16 If you care for children between 6pm and 2am in hotels, guest houses or similar places. The care is for children of no more than two different clients, staying at the same place at the same time (babysitting arrangements).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...