Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone had any experience with owning a leasehold property of which Southwark Council is the freeholder, but not in a council housing situation? I'm on the verge of putting an offer on a flat in ED which is in this situation and, being a cautious first time buyer, I wondered whether this was something that was likely to throw up issues during the conveyancing process or in the future (or, conversely, might be a good thing). Any thoughts or experiences would be very welcome.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12762-southwark-council-as-freeholder/
Share on other sites

Hi,


Southwark are our freeholders. We didn't have any problems in the conveyancing process but we've got some repairs that they, as freeholders, are liable to carry out and it's an absolute nightmare trying to get them to do anything about it.


There are pluses in terms of having a large public body with elected representatives as the freeholder as at least there is someone you can get hold of to complain to etc and there are elected bodies, such as the Home Owners Council, to represent the views of leaseholders to the council. In my opinion, this is better than an absentee landlord who lives in another country who you can't get in touch with when something goes wrong.


However, Southwark Council is a massive bureaucracy - so you've got that to contend with if you want to get anything done - and they're also in a large amount of debt and massively behind with their housing stock renovation programme (about 10 years behind is the last I heard) so I don't think leaseholders are high on their priority list in terms of repairs etc. Hence our situation.


My advice would be, try and find a flat where you own a share of the freehold. It may be more expensive but at least you're in control!

werdna101 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> My advice would be, try and find a flat where you

> own a share of the freehold. It may be more

> expensive but at least you're in control!


Good advice if the other leaseholders are willing or able to share responsibility/cost of any repairs. A nightmare if they're not! If the flat (and the common parts e.g. roof) you're buying is in a good enough condition to survive the next ten years with no repair full employment with good salaries. (Be very careful of the retired on low incomes- they'll tug at your heart strings while you pay all the bills)

I can only second werdna101's opinion. We have a problem with our roof and it looks most likely that the council will not pay for it. The reason behind this is a clause called 'major works surcharge' which indicates that they may charge you for any repairs up to 10000 pounds.You can apply for an interest free loan, but given the bureaucracy involved it could take very long, not good if you need an emergency repair.


Check your contract, have a complete survery of the property done and then make your decision.


Good luck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...