Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Our 6 week old doesn't like the cocoon and our toddler is a bit too big to comfortably nap in the seat that goes on top in toddler-newborn mode. I can't wait to set the P&T (Vibe) up in toddler-toddler mode but know this is still a few months away.


Our baby is big and growing fast, she'll be among the early switchers - but when can you reasonably switch? I know that I'll know when the time is right when it comes but I'd like to have a bit of an idea. Of course P&T tells you 6 months or so but that's not when most parents will really switch. Looking for some real life examples :)

Good question, SP. I was thinking the same thing. I've got the P and T Sport and my huge,long 7 week old is already looking squashed in the cocoon and I can't imagine he's going to last another 3 months in it. Also when you do switch, does the baby go on the top or the bottom?

Bishberro Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good question, SP. I was thinking the same thing.

> I've got the P and T Sport and my huge,long 7 week

> old is already looking squashed in the cocoon and

> I can't imagine he's going to last another 3

> months in it. Also when you do switch, does the

> baby go on the top or the bottom?


In theory, the oldest/heaviest child always goes on top (pushchair could tip backwards otherwise). In reality, the older child seems to prefer the bottom seat because it's "cool" and he/she can get in and out more easily.


As for the squashed feeling, I can hardly fit my (flat) hand between my baby's (not excessively chunky) legs and the bottom of the toddler seat in toddler-newborn mode, which I find a bit scary.

I put my baby in the bottom seat at about 3 months. She is quite big for her age. She's fine in there, sometimes slumping a bit to the side but not forwards. I tried her on top and toddler in the bottom but it tipped up too easily. She hated the cocoon and was too long for it. Give it ago - you can always switch back.

edanna Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I put my baby in the bottom seat at about 3

> months. She is quite big for her age. She's fine

> in there, sometimes slumping a bit to the side but

> not forwards. I tried her on top and toddler in

> the bottom but it tipped up too easily. She hated

> the cocoon and was too long for it. Give it ago -

> you can always switch back.


Yeah was thinking of trying that in a couple of weeks or so and use car seat padding to give her more support. Just worried her head will be shaken too much on rougher surfaces (not planning on offroading heheh but some pavements are pretty uneven too) so will have to observe that very closely...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
    • No party is willing to tackle the "elephant in the room" which is the national debt. It is costing the country circa £100 Billion ANNUALLY to service that debt. That is more than the defence and education budgets. That debt burden has to be reduced which in reality means cost cuts. That means cutting back state pensions, index-linked pensions for civil servants and others such as police, NHS etc. It means cutting back on universal credit and cutting the number of people who are claiming benefits.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...