Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We are off on hols with our 15 month old shortly, and know there is no high chair where we are going.


I have one of the cloth ones, which does not always seem to do the trick with us. Are there "travel" high chairs on the market, and if so , what would you recommend (ideally that packs away quite small).


Thanks


K

I'd second the handysitt. I'm a recent convert to them and can't praise them highly enough. We've also used the cloth wraparound ones which were fine when he was much younger, but no good for a strong toddler, and I've always been afraid to leave him unattended in it. (probably due to the fact that the one time I did he fell out!)


They aren't the cheapest, but my niece is now 4.5 and has only just stopped using hers so I don't think it's bad value for money.

Hi - we have 2(!) - a phil and teds which is great but doesn't fit on all tables, and a softer one from mothercare/jojos - perhaps this one, which is good as fits on most chairs and quite easy to chuck in the bottom of the buggy - it lifts them up just a bit more than the cloth ones. Saved out lives in Spain this year as nowhere seemed to have high chairs!
KBN - we found where we were (andalucia) NONE of the cafes or restaurants had high chairs at all - it was really weird - they seemed to expect you to feed your child in the buggy....not remotely possible the way baby snowboarder eats!! They looked at us in amusement when we whipped out our travel high chair!! So would recommend getting one as easy as poss to carry around...

We got this one for going on hols this year.


http://www.amazon.co.uk/Swing-Tray-Booster-Seat-Blue/dp/B001TH8GW2/ref=sr_1_29?ie=UTF8&s=baby&qid=1282501544&sr=8-29


It's not as light as the blow up ones but we found them a little scary as our LO gets bigger and more mobile - the sides seemed a little insecure. We liked this one as it was stronger and hence we felt better for a full 2 weeks of constant use but still portable. A little fiddly to clean if food gets in the seams but easy enough to take apart to clean.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...