Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think the point about the prices at the MIND shop is incredibly valid.


Yes they give money to charity BUT they are also meant to be a place where you can buy SECOND HAND items which are priced as second hand items. I have often seen that items there are priced the same as they would when brand new which is a shame and in the end loses them money rather than makes it because people just won't be prepared to pay.


It's a point well made and trying to pull the charity card is a shame.

Prussia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Yes they give money to charity BUT they are also

> meant to be a place where you can buy SECOND HAND

> items which are priced as second hand items.


There is a clear view by one section of this forum that charity shops are 'meant to be a place where you can buy SECOND HAND items which are priced as second hand items'. Whilst there are some charity shops that have been set up to provide low cost clothing, the MIND shop is not one of them (it's worth looking at their website, and that of Oxfam and the Red Cross, to see what the purpose of the charity shops is stated to be). There is no law requiring that they set the price below the original cost of the item, and there is nothing in the MIND shops advertising or charity literature to say that they do (The Red Cross does mention 'grab yourself a bargain' which could be construed to suggest it but the rest of the wording indicates that this is just a slogan). The value of an item is what someone is prepared, or able, to pay for it; what it cost previously is irrelevant.

If you don't like the prices in this shop then don't use it. If they have an empty shop for days on end they'll soon change their pricing structure. If they keep turning a healthy profit then they won't.

  • 3 weeks later...

Haven't read it all but looks like an interesting article on how charity shops (based on an Oxfam example) operate and the contribution they can make to their community.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/jan/04/what-happens-to-oxfam-donations

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
    • Unless you're 5 years old or have been living in a cave for several decades you can't be for real. I don't believe that you're genuinely confused by this, no one who has access to newspapers, the tv news, the internet would ask this. Either you're an infant, or have recently woken up from a coma after decades, or you're a supercilious tw*t
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...