Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think the point about the prices at the MIND shop is incredibly valid.


Yes they give money to charity BUT they are also meant to be a place where you can buy SECOND HAND items which are priced as second hand items. I have often seen that items there are priced the same as they would when brand new which is a shame and in the end loses them money rather than makes it because people just won't be prepared to pay.


It's a point well made and trying to pull the charity card is a shame.

Prussia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Yes they give money to charity BUT they are also

> meant to be a place where you can buy SECOND HAND

> items which are priced as second hand items.


There is a clear view by one section of this forum that charity shops are 'meant to be a place where you can buy SECOND HAND items which are priced as second hand items'. Whilst there are some charity shops that have been set up to provide low cost clothing, the MIND shop is not one of them (it's worth looking at their website, and that of Oxfam and the Red Cross, to see what the purpose of the charity shops is stated to be). There is no law requiring that they set the price below the original cost of the item, and there is nothing in the MIND shops advertising or charity literature to say that they do (The Red Cross does mention 'grab yourself a bargain' which could be construed to suggest it but the rest of the wording indicates that this is just a slogan). The value of an item is what someone is prepared, or able, to pay for it; what it cost previously is irrelevant.

If you don't like the prices in this shop then don't use it. If they have an empty shop for days on end they'll soon change their pricing structure. If they keep turning a healthy profit then they won't.

  • 3 weeks later...

Haven't read it all but looks like an interesting article on how charity shops (based on an Oxfam example) operate and the contribution they can make to their community.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/jan/04/what-happens-to-oxfam-donations

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Well worth a read   https://manchestermill.co.uk/the-men-who-raised-the-flags/
    • If it was limited to a couple of days a year, so we all knew, that would be fine. In the last few years (and it is a recent thing) you get random fireworks going off any time after dusk for half the year. It does more than cause problems for pets and wildlife- it can mean lasting damage and massive expense and hassle for pet owners. All because some get a buzz out of loud bangs.
    • Ohh dear.  Fireworks can be great fun.  Where I used to live the kids would have firework wars/games.  Watching them was more enjoyable than watching  TV. (Which you could hardly hear due to the pops and bangs).  It's not like anyone/anything could stop them. I would still prefer organised public displays that are affordable.   And I agree that fireworks cause problems for wild life, pets and people.   It seems to be one of those things that just happens so we have to put up with it.  But it is still not as problematic here as in other areas in London - that's for sure.
    • I made sure to set off a few today just to rile you guys up 😇😂 Always looking for something to criticise 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...