Jump to content

Recommended Posts

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> Since between them the Sun, DM and DE have a

> total

> > sales of under 4 million- and there are people

> who

> > only read the sport, or only do the puzzle

> pages.

> >

> > I think that most people make up their minds

> about

> > what is going on in the UK from their own daily

> > experiences.

>

> That rather disregards the fact that most papers

> are shared between people - a family sharing the

> one paper, papers shared between workmates, etc -

> so the real readership is a lot higher than the

> actual sales. Plus, of course, the internet, with

> the DM website, God help mankind, apparently the

> most popular in the world.

>

> People make a lot of decisions on the basis of

> what they see around them, but when it comes to

> something requiring expert analysis - for example,

> the economic benefits or otherwise of Brexit -

> surely they can only rely on the information

> gleaned from the press?


Most people get this from the TV (and mainly the BBC), (and I suppose increasingly worryingly the Internet) - the supposed massive influence of the press is a myth and a stock answer from those that are so certain in their rightgiousness thet still can't see why people have different opinions to them and why for eg the working class don't all vote Labour. People choose what newspapers to read and the Mirror, the Guardian and more left wing alternatives have all been in sharper long term decline than the more 'right wing' newspapers, The Sun wot won it is one of the biggest myths of politics - The Sun switched to Blair for eg when it saw the way the electorate was moving. People aren't gullible media led saps - (though anyone who post a link to The Canary is clearly :) ).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
    • He is toast  he should never have been appointed  and starmer flannelling about all of this shows exceptionally poor judgement  a disgrace all around 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...