Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,

The Conservation Volunteers (TCV) are trying to fund a project in Dawson?s Hill park. We are seeking your feedback and interest in a potential project to help us design the project and secure funding. It would be appreciated if you could please answer the following questions:


1. Do you currently use Dawson?s Hill?



2. If yes, how often?



3. Do you think Dawson?s Hill adds value to the local community?



4. Would you support a project to improve Dawson?s Hill facilities? The facilities we would like to improve are the following:

a. New natural play area

b. New seating and removing some of the old brick seating

c. Path improvements

d. New signs and information boards at key locations



5. If a project goes ahead do you think you might participate in project activities and events?



6. Would you potentially be interested in being part of a residents group who works with Southwark Council to look after the park?



7. Any other comments

It is good but I can see why it can be off-putting, even a tad intimidating, especially when it is dark. It is great on Bonfire Night/NYE and during the dog days of summer, and when you just want to get away from it all, but there is room for improvement so long as it is not sanitised.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...