After School nanny needed - Herne Hill

By brockwellmum
November 17, 2016 in The Family Room Classifieds

Recommended Posts

brockwellmum

Posted November 17, 2016

- Share

Posted November 17, 2016

Hi there

We are a friendly family of five who are looking for an after school nanny to look after our three children (a daughter of 10, a son of 7 and a daughter of 5) three days a week. You'd need to pick them up from Rosendale school and walk them home through the park to our house (a 10 min walk), help entertain them and then cook them tea before my husband or I gets home at 6.30.

Our eldest daughter is very self sufficient and needs little supervision - she loves baking, reading and sewing. Our son is 7 - he loves playing football in the park on the way home, reading and board games. our smallest loves playdoh and imaginary games - she has just started school.

Luckily there is no homework at the school - so no need to nag children to do any work - though it would be great if you would help our youngest with her reading book!

Basic hours 3.25 till 6.30 on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday but more available by negotiation.

?10 an hour

Please PM me if interested!

Emily

Link to comment

https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/131650-after-school-nanny-needed-herne-hill/

Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Advertise Here
Latest Discussions
- Councillor Jon Hartley
  
  By MaryT · Posted 23 minutes ago
  
  CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
- Cllr Williams to stand down
  
  By jazzer · Posted 32 minutes ago
  
  I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co. He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.
- Cllr Williams to stand down
  
  By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted 33 minutes ago
  
  Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one. In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
- Rude Evri delivery in SE22
  
  By KalamityKel · Posted 42 minutes ago
  
  I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️

Sign In