Jump to content

Not many people appear to know this but Parmesan isn't vegetarian.


Recommended Posts

Reminds me of the scene in "Notting Hill"


Keziah: No thanks, I'm a fruitarian.

Max: I didn't realize that.

William: And, ahm: what exactly is a fruitarian?

Keziah: We believe that fruits and vegetables have feeling so we think cooking is cruel. We only eat things that have actually fallen off a tree or bush - that are, in fact, dead already.

William: Right. Right. Interesting stuff. So, these carrots...

Keziah: Have been murdered, yes.

William: Murdered? Poor carrots. How beastly!

I love it when non-vegetarians tell us veggies what we should and shouldn't eat ;-) People are vegetarian for different reasons - I don't eat meat or fish because I don't like the taste or texture of either. Not because I am upset about the death of an animal particularly. If I liked it I may well eat it. But I do try to avoid animal products such as gelatine but it isn't always easy, especially when you eat out. As for wine, well I am not standing in a pub asking if the Pinot is vegetarian...

peterstorm1985 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> You're right. I'm not a vegetarian (as you can

> probably guess), but I am a strict avoider of any

> meat that's been factory farmed, and sometimes do

> end up choosing the vegetarian option when I'm not

> certain of the origins of the meat. Cheese does

> seem to play a large part of the vegetarian option

> a little too often. But it often has eggs in it

> too, and then I spend a guilt ridden evening

> presuming they're from battery hens......

> And of course, a lot of vegetables will be grown

> using animal manure (which wouldn't exist if the

> animals weren't grown for milk/meat/eggs), so if

> you think too hard you'd never eat.



Quite so. However, given that animal manure and animal derived rennet are by-products of the meat and dairy trade. so on balance, I still think it makes sense to avoid....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just a quick note that my son was mugged last night on Dunstans Road just after 6pm. Two youths on bikes with balaclavas stole his phone, headphones and driver’s license near the mansion block next to Dawson’s Heights. Please be vigilant when walking in the area after dark. 
    • They clearly don’t.  I would expect better from the council.  Rather dismally, it sounds like any complaints or requests just fall on deaf ears.
    • No, because they are a business and their job is to make a profit. It is the local council, on our behalf, who should be giving regard to the environment. Gala, not unreasonably, might take the view that it is the council's role to protect the environment of Southwark, and if they have no objection to this scheme then frankly why shouldn't they (Gala) go ahead? And the council also seems to take the view that they are focused on revenue and not the environment. Otherwise they might listen to the environmental pleas here. The mistake you are making is assuming that either party to this transaction (we are clearly only bystanders) gives a flying fig for the environment when there is money in the offing.
    • It struck me last year that any dialogue with Gala themselves e.g. at the box-ticking "Community Engagement Sessions" is completely pointless, as they are just a business trying to do whatever is necessary to hold their event; the park is just a venue to them, a necessary facility, and they'll say anything to secure it. They don't care about it's welfare or upkeep, over and above making sure there's no complaints big enough to prevent them using it again. I've found that discussing issues with them has just led to them using that info to counteract that issue - effectively helping them strengthen their position. What I find frustrating is that the council, despite being the body that decides on this, and should be representing local residents, takes no active part in any discussions or presentations, so there's no way to engage with them apart from an online consultation which is clearly also a box ticking exercise, bearing in mind for the last two years the overwhelming majority (97% of respondents) objected to the event. Why are Gala running the community meetings? Why do Gala run the issue hotline? If the council really care about the park and the surrounding community, and still allow this type of event, they should be way more hands on with taking responsibility for it's running, not just handing it all over to a profit making company.  Sorry, probably tldr but so sad about the repeated negative impact on our (once beautiful & peaceful) park and just exasperated that there's so little that can be done to halt it. This is just the start, it WILL turn into another Brockwell Park, and Gala & the council just don't care.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...