Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have my LO booked in for BCG tomorrow morning, he will turn 1 on Monday.


I'm just wondering what people's thoughts and experiences are on the BCG in babies? It seems so young to have it done, is TB really a threat? I know not all boroughs offer it, therefore am wondering how important it is? (Am aware though its offered in inner London boroughs due to demographics and high density population etc)


I remember having mine done at 12 years old and it REALLY hurt and I had an awful time with the scab. Just am having cold feet about inflicting that upon him when I can't explain what it is!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/13427-thoughts-on-bcg-in-12-month-old/
Share on other sites

i asked my gp and she said it wouldn't be offered again when they are older (we used to have it at 12/13 yrs). gp said it was done earlier now. yes it is a horrible injection, so take sweets and treats with you!


to be honest, my boy (about 5 months then) stopped crying as soon as he was out of the room and away from the nurse. he wasn't unwell after the injection, but as soon as i got home i gave him a dose of calpol just in case it was sore!!


good luck with it xxx

ok thanks Ko. I want to just go for it and get it out of the way its just he has his MMR the week after and feel I am really barraging him with jabs. Just curious as well as I had to ask my HV to request the BCG, its not like they actively get you to have it like the MMR, so made me wonder if it was really necessary.


I'll take a warm bottle of milk with me and some blueberries (current fave treat) x

There was a thread about this a while ago Lochie, you might find it if you do a search.


I had both mine done under the age of 1 and neither seemed bothered by it at all afterwards, other than a quick cry immediately after having the jab.


I think having it done when older is much worse, sore arm, more likely to knock it etc. It isn't essential, but personally I'd go for it.


Good luck.

we got a letter about it, so i think you should be contacted about it, but as with all these things sometimes they forget!


they also seem to ring people up on the day if they have spaces, which is unfair as doesn't give you much time to decide, so if they do that to anyone you should just say its not enough notice for you.

My little girl had hers done when she was tiny as I was sure I wanted it done due to my work and possible exposure to TB. I thought actually it was the easiest of all the injenctions. I think they told me that any after effects are very uncommon.

BCG is not a universal immunization, eg not routinely given elsewhere like the States. It's also a controversial vaccine because of low efficacy, not because of intrinsic problems with the immunization against TB.


The site of BCG injection can be prone to local infection. Despite GPs insistence to leave the site uncovered, advice from a dermatologist was to use blister plasters. These keep out bacteria and help protect the wound from abrasion. The advice to keep wounds uncovered is really a holdover from Victorian times when bandages themselves were not sterile and could cause infection.


If suspect your little one's BCG has become infected, you may need to see a specialist. Typical oral antibiotics may not clear the infection due to the nature of the scar tissue that forms with the BCG.


If you're not in a high-risk group, the BCG is not really necessary. But if it would put your mind at ease to have your Little One immunised, then by all means have it done on the NHS before the offer expires. As to having the MMR so soon afterwards, I would personally wait a little while (it does seem like a lot at once, poor little nippers!). However, I don't know of any hard evidence that having then consecutively is harmful.

Just had BCG done, it was fine, little whimper but no big tears. Had it done at Townley Road which was virtually empty and we were seen straight away, so no waiting.

Saffron - yes you are right re: MMR, they said he can't have it for the next 4 weeks and when he does have it he'll have to have it in leg not arm.

Thanks for all the advice, am glad its done. Not sure i'll be saying that when his arm is oozing pus!!! ;-) But for now he is happily sleeping in his cot with his teddy so no major trauma thank goodness

x

Hope your son gets through it OK. My first at 6 months, had and has barely a scratch but the second who had it at 8 months had a raised angry pus-oozing red scab for about 6 months, maybe more. He now has a lilac coloured crater in his arm. The two experiences couldn't have been more different. Whatever happens though, it will pass x

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You are right . It isn't going to change him for the better. Sending such a negative message is potentially counter-productive. Trump is narcissistic, arrogant, unpredictable, spiteful, divisive, and dishonest, with a penchant for a total a disregard for democratic norms.  He is one who bears a grudge so there's a case to be made for not offending him as he could react with a bunch of  adverse actions  such as  deciding to increase import tariffs on UK exports to the US.      
    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...