Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That none of these will happen:


people (and my neighbour) suddenly realise that Bach had more to say than One Direction (or whoever, it is sometimes difficult to tell)


those who buy the Daily Mail join the enlightenment


the police accept that they are responsible for deaths in custody


the prison service recognise that prisons manufacture criminality and call a strike to stop it


central government accepts that the care of elderly people is their responsibility


teachers have an epiphany: that they are part of the problem


the 'war on drugs' is seen to be the stupidity it is


politicians admit that surveillance is not good just because 'if you are doing nothing wrong then you have nothing to fear'

From the BBC website today


"Of course, inflation is still at historically low levels - and no one is predicting a 1970s-style spike"


I predict that this is wrong


(as in, no one is predicting we will Brexit, no one seriously thinks Trump will win and other nonsense read this year)


The build-up to inflation is uncannily similar to the circumstances of the early 1970s - oil prices, lagged effect of monetary easing, fall in the pound, unsustainable government debt, a government that will attempt to spend their way to re-election ...

Henry_17 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JW, L16,

>

> What you are missing is that if there were to be a

> large surprise in inflation it would lead to

> mayhem in asset prices. This would be unpopular

> and so the government and central bank who after

> all have complete control won't let it happen.


Ho Ho HO ..! If only it were so simple. The Government & central banks have only very little control of inflation or asset values. Inflation & other economic impacts creep up on any economy & are also susceptible to external events & influences - we are dangerously close to the point where the little control they have in the UK will cease to be effective.


Most companies are holding back on passing on price increases & are maintaining jobs but that cannot hold out forever.


Today's economic picture looks reasonable but based on lagging data. The new year [Q1 & Q2 2017] will show very different outcomes - lets see what the picture is like next September/December.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Well he couldn’t deliver anything better than a poor brexit. Because no such thing exists 
    • Fair points jazzer. But it begs the question, on what information are people basing their opinion? because if it’s x or the right wing media the of course they will believe nothing has happened but people who claim to be motivated by rising immigration numbers are either ignorant of or don’t care the those numbers have dropped significantly since Labour got in Hospital waiting lists are finally showing improvements after years of getting worse people on minimum wage are better off We haven’t had a random general election or new prime minister just months after the last one  compare that to Tory chaos Important relations with other countries (important for long term trade and growth) have improved under labour given the size of the mess they inherited it’s far better than many give credit for  and the prospect of a Badenoch and/or farage govt returning us to the chaos of last 10 years? No thanks (I could do a long list of things Labour have done wrong or badly but that’s for another thread. I did not vote for Labour, but all things considered they are a massive improvement on what came before. Unfortunately we have a bunch of far right agitators kicking off around the country because they are cry babies which gives impression country is going downhill  when it’s really not)  
    • he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
    • Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...