Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm psyching myself up to start potty training my son and just wondered if any veterans on the subject had any thoughts on potties. I wanted to get two - one for upstairs and one for downstairs but it seems like you can pay from a few quid to ?20 quid plus for some. Is it worth paying out for a posher one like a Baby bjorn or will a basic one do the job? Some of them looked so small, I wasn't sure my son would be very comfy sat on them for long periods of time.

I had three little potties scattered all over the house when dd1 was potty training (including the baby bjorn and a ridiculous Japanese one with a fuzzy seat and handle to hold on to) plus one of those that sit directly on the toilet seat. When it came time to train dd2, she refused to use any of the little potties and preferred to sit on the toilet either with or without the baby seat.


If I had to do it again I'd just get the cheap baby potty as it doesn't really matter and in the end and they will get used to it. In my opinion.


Good luck potty training!

I bought one of the cheaper ones (can't remember the brand), and you are right they are small. My son couldn't sit properly on it and it was a waste of money. So opted for the baby bjorn which is expensive but my son is really comfortable on it and loves going potty!

He is now using a step and a toilet seat (baby bjorn again) for upstairs which he likes too.

DD1 loved a potty the childminder had, which is one Mothercare & others sell I think - it's like a little chair, so has back support, with the actual potty bit that lifts out so easy to empty.


I got one for DD2, to use alongside the basic one I already had, but like candj above, DD2 is insisting on sitting on the toilet - to be like big sister I guess....sigh....


In the end I don't think it matters too much which type you get, as they will use whatever you have and wont know any different.


Molly

With No1, she was very choosy about her potty at the start. We had a baby bjorn one and a very basic one too that she just didn't seem to get on with at all - she just couldn't seem to work out how to sit down on them. (She's never been good with physical stuff.) I was almost thinking we'd have to wait although I knew she was ready. In the end we went up to Mothercare and let her try a few. She picked out one, put it on the floor and sat down on it like a pro - we bought 2 and never looked back.


If you've got the chance, maybe go to Mothercare or the like and see how your LO takes to them - he may have a preference. Or if you have friends whose kids are training already, maybe he could try some that way.

We had a basic one that was just too small - I think this is perhaps more of an issue with boys because if they have trouble fitting their willy in you will have pee all over the place. We bought two of the baby bjorn ones, not the ones like a throne, but they do have a removable insert, and I think they are worth the money - they are a much more sensible shape than many other potties.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...