Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Q. What are the three most useless things in the world?


A. (1) A chocolate teapot (2) A one legged man at an arse kicking party and (3) Southwark Council's Planning Sub-Committee B.


I have chosen (3) after attending a three and half hour meeting of the Sub-Committee last night in which only three items were discussed, the last of which was a planning application relating to our next door property in ED to which we objected. The level of debate was almost universally abysmal, a conclusion which I reached well before our item. The Sub-Committee discussed the first item, then voted to reject the application, then voted to accept the rejection, then clearly became so confused that they finally voted to defer the matter! At least I think that was what happened, as it was difficult to work out what was going on. All this took one and half hours, with in effect no decision being made unless a deferral can be regarded as a decision.


My faith in local democracy was already pretty low, but it is now even lower.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/135167-southwark-democracy-in-action/
Share on other sites

Administrator, this was about a planning application relating to an ED property, so surely it should in the General ED Issues section - it affects ED residents who come into contact with Southwark's planning and democratic system. I have amended the post to refer specifically to ED. Is that good enough?
After attending a few council meetings it became clear that, above all, the party line has to be toed, and objections will arise even though councillors, will ( in one case by his own admission) object even if they do not understand or know anything about the matter in hand

Actually there was no party line at last night's meeting. Labour and Lib Dem Councillors were equally unimpressive and none seemed to know what they were doing.


Although we expected our objection to be unsuccessful and at the very best hoped that next door's planning application would be deferred for further information, we were very concerned about the way in which the Sub-Committee dealt with our objection. We emailed detailed comments on the officer report to all Sub-Committee members as well as the Planning Department; however it was clear that virtually none of the members had bothered to read our comments and showed no inclination to ask us questions about them even though we had highlighted a number of ways in the officer report was inadequate and actively invited questions. It seemed as if they wanted to deal with the item quickly so that they could go home, after having wasted half the meeting discussing an application which they then deferred in some confusion! (see my OP) The only Councillor who showed any interest was one of our Ward Councillors who spoke on our behalf.


I used to work in local government as a solicitor and attended numerous Planning Committee meetings, many of them deeply tedious, but last night's meeting was probably the most inept that I have attended.

Democracty in action? Well it was democracy in that your elected representatives made a decision.


If you can do any better then I suggest you stand for a councillor.


I've experienced great frustration with numerous issues at a local level. But then occasionally stand back and think that there is a lot of hard work for little reward.


If you really are a solicitor then you will know all about the avenues to complain and how to escalate this. Sounds like you just want to have a good whinge. In fact whay are you even troubling us when the Russians are running amok in Syria and we are helping to provide the Saudis with indiscriminate weapons that are causing hell in the Yemen?


And we have a monkey in charge of the Whitehouse in the New Year.


As a non-solicitor my advice is if you are unhappy serve them with pre-JR notice - loads of good templates on line.


OK I have some crimbo cards to write.

People who use baby like words such as "crimbo", "sarnie" and "prezzie" the whole time are usually pretty suspect and you, my friend, are no exception.


I don't need to be reminded about the state of the world. I post about it regularly on Facebook and elsewhere. It's just that, as you may have noticed, Russia, Syria and Yemen are not in ED, or even Southwark, which is why I am posting in the ED Forum. Indeed, as you will also see, I originally posted this item on the ED Issues page, but for some reason it was sent to the Lounge


I don't intend to apply for judicial review - there are no grounds to do so. However, if you were to read my post rather than insult me, you will have see that my complaint was about the disrespect with which the Sub Committee treated us. As you weren't there, you are in no position to tell me how they behaved.


I have done something about it - I have in fact contacted a local newspaper about the seriously weird voting that took place.


As for the motivation for standing as Councillor, my observation was that most of the Sub Committee members were seriously "up themselves", as indeed you are, my friend.

Zebedee - having had a quick look at this ,I'm wondering why no measurements were quoted to substantiate the planning officer's conclusion that the development would not result in a loss of less than 50% of what they call amenity space which they equate with the rear garden .


And ,not that it would help your case but I thought it was 50% of land around the orginal house ?


I share your concern about the lack of knowledge /professionalism at these meetings .

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To digress

>

> "People who use baby like words such as "crimbo",

> "sarnie" and "prezzie" the whole time are usually

> pretty suspect ..."

>

> Wasn't it John Lennon who first popularised the

> term 'Crimbo'?


QED


[runs for cover]

Intexas, we sent all the Councillors a lengthy objection dealing with the lack of evidence in the report to substantiate the Planning Officer's conclusions on many issues, including the 50% issue, and recommended that consideration of the report should be deferred for further information and consultation. As we had only a limited time to address the Sub Committee we invited members to ask us questions on our objections but there was a singular lack of response from Councillors who appeared to have decided what they wanted to do and who didn't therefore even go through the motions of looking interested.


The calculation of the garden area comprised in the planning unit was complicated since the applicant who had a leasehold interest in the bottom flat and a shared freehold in the whole house had overstated the amount of back garden that they in fact owned or controlled - they in fact had NO interest, freehold and leasehold, in a substantial part of the back garden. As a result it was necessary for the applicant to amend the plans on at least three occasions, but even then the Planning Officer attached the wrong plan to the report!


I am glad that you have made some serious points in your post rather than some irrelevant points about Russia, Syria or the like.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> nxjen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > "People who use baby like words such as "crimbo" ... are usually pretty suspect ..."

> >

> > Wasn't it John Lennon who first popularised the term 'Crimbo'?

>

> QED


I'll never doubt his talents as a songwriter and singer, but bloody hell, "Imagine" makes me want to smash the radio into tiny pieces.

Robert Elms, the journalist, once said that he hated "Imagine" more than any other song. This is because when it was first released he was a young boy from a poor family living in a Council flat in W London and it sickened him to hear one of the richest people in the UK singing about having "no possessions". The same John Lennon who had two apartments in the Dakota Building, one of the most expensive blocks in NYC, one of which was bought purely to provide a home for Yoko Ono's extensive collection of furs.

I always think of this when I think of Lennon.



"In 1967, John Lennon wrote a song called, ?All You Need is Love.? He also beat both of his wives, abandoned one of his children, verbally abused his gay Jewish manager with homophobic and anti-semitic slurs, and once had a camera crew film him lying naked in his bed for an entire day.


Thirty-five years later, Trent Reznor from Nine Inch Nails wrote a song called ?Love is Not Enough.? Reznor, despite being famous for his shocking stage performances and his grotesque and disturbing videos, got clean from all drugs and alcohol, married one woman, had two children with her, and then cancelled entire albums and tours so that he could stay home and be a good husband and father.


One of these two men had a clear and realistic understanding of love. One of them did not. One of these men idealized love as the solution to all of his problems. One of them did not. One of these men was probably a narcissistic asshole. One of them was not."




As Jeremy says, he was undoubtedly a great songwriter, but other than that he was a cock.

In "The Ballad Of John And Yoko", Lennon sang:


"Christ you know it ain't easy

You know how hard it can be

The way things are going

They're going to crucify me".


Well, if you publicly celebrate your honeymoon by inviting the press in to witness your "Bed-In" at the Amsterdam Hilton Hotel and your demonstration of "bagism", you can't be surprised if people ridicule you. But of course Lennon equated himself with Christ, so he used the word "crucify".

Z, your initial post was a whinge.


And now you have gone off at a tangent. For some reason precipitated by my use of the term chrimbo.



Step back and see how others may view your posting. PErhaps everyone else is too polite, or probably not bothered.


Complain to the Council, go to the Local Authority Ombudsman, write you your MP - and then come back to this site. I doubt whether the papers or Private Eye will be interested. Funnily enough I have been there.


The planning system may be arbritary, subjective etc but that's the one we have. Looking at the planning disasters around my way sadly it happens. I got nowhere in trying to shame the planning officer/s.

If other people aren't bothered to comment on my posts, then why were you bothered, malumbu? Was it to try to show how smart you think you are?


The last time that I encountered snarky point scoring like yours was more than 50 years ago in the school playground. But the snarky people then had the excuse of being only 13 years old. What's your excuse?

We had an almost identical experience to Zebedee with Southwark's Planning Committee. After a great deal of work in preparing our objection to our neighbours' planning application, not one of the councillors bothered to question any of the points we or several neighbours had raised, and the application was approved with no discussion whatsoever. No-one acknowledged that the planning officer had never bothered to visit us to see the impact the development would have on our property, despite assurances that he would discuss the proposal with us, and his comments regarding our concerns were based on what little he could see from peering over the dividing garden wall. This application was heard late in the evening, after a long debate about a controversial application, by which time it was very clear that the councillors wanted to get home. Now that it has been built, the extension is every bit as hideous as we had feared; it has ruined the outlook from the rear of our house, and has greatly reduced the light to our patio.

I'm very sorry to hear this, Growlybear, and hope that a certain contributor to this thread won't accuse you of "whingeing".


At least in our case because of our original comments, and before the application reached the Sub Committee, we managed to get the Planning Officer to persuade the applicant to reduce their proposed rear extension on our side, so hopefully it won't be as bad as the original proposal would have been.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We’ve got a gap on the roof of our shed that needs patching  don’t want to buy a huge roll so hoping someone has some leftover  happy to collect/reimburse 
    • I never said I thought it was targeted or deliberate. There also has never been a “stand off” or confrontation, we’ve spoken to them in a friendly manner about it. Our experience is they don’t seem to care. That’s the frustrating thing for us, if someone politely raises a concern at least take a second to reflect. Treat others how you would want to be treated.  I don’t want them to lose their job, far from it. But considering it could cost me a days work to fix any damage, I’m within my right to try prevent it.   
    • The SE22 Evri delivery family are lovely, and always say hello wherever we spot them in the area. We gave them a box of chocolates during Covid as they were working their socks off at Christmas
    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...