After school care needed 1 - 2 days per week

By Layla's Mum
January 2, 2017 in The Family Room Classifieds

Recommended Posts

Layla's Mum

Posted January 2, 2017

- Share

Posted January 2, 2017

We are a friendly family in Honor Oak Park looking for after school care 1 or 2 days per week for 2 kids (aged 7 and 10), term time only (you can do extra hours during school holidays if you prefer but this is not a requirement).

We are looking for someone with a fun and loving character to pick the kids up from school, get them to after school activities, play with them, co-ordinate homework and provide light evening meal (usually doesn't require cooking).

Hours are 3.15pm until 7pm (could be 6.30pm if necessary), particular days of the week and timing can be agreed.

Driving licence is a requirement (own car preferred) as you will need to be able drive to after school activities and kids are at different schools until September.

Rates depending on experience and qualifications. Will need recent CRB check and references for previous childcare experience.

Please contact me with your CV if you are interested.

Thanks.

Link to comment

https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/136503-after-school-care-needed-1-2-days-per-week/

Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Advertise Here
Latest Discussions
- Councillor Jon Hartley
  
  By MaryT · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
- Cllr Williams to stand down
  
  By jazzer · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co. He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.
- Cllr Williams to stand down
  
  By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one. In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
- Rude Evri delivery in SE22
  
  By KalamityKel · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️

Sign In