Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Shouldn't bringing up and educating children be a shared process between home and school? If schools don't engage with parents they disengage and become resentful. If parents don't engage with schools they feel like they're banging their heads against a brick wall. Does this do our youngsters any good? Not so much. It is upto schools to lead the way in this partnership as they are the professional base at which all your kids come together. Having a three way agreement is in no way about setting standards for parenting but a suggestion of ways in which they can provide support for each other (and support sometimes looks a bit like challenge). I find it interesting that on the one hand some of these threads go on about a waste of resources. Why don't you think about the waste of energy you've expended going on about it and how you could have used it positively to help your kids!

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm pleased to come from a family with three

> generations of teachers on both sides of the

> state/private divide. We lived, ate and breathed

> education.

>

> It wasn't the leaflet that raised my eyebrows, and

> that's why I didn't mention it.

>

> I can assure you from a well informed position

> that the inability for some parents to recognise

> that education is a three way contract between the

> child, the parents and the school is one of the

> biggest problems facing our education system.



I can assure you Huguenot that many people put an awful lot into supporting Goodrich School. I have been absolutley amazed by the time and effort some people are willing to put into organisation, fund raising and general school support at Goodrich.


I think these people deserve, 1) the school as a whole and 2) the Head specifically to be at least as dedicated as the parents in responding to the needs of local people, with the aim of providing a school that meets their expectations on all matters of teaching and communication.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...