Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Shouldn't bringing up and educating children be a shared process between home and school? If schools don't engage with parents they disengage and become resentful. If parents don't engage with schools they feel like they're banging their heads against a brick wall. Does this do our youngsters any good? Not so much. It is upto schools to lead the way in this partnership as they are the professional base at which all your kids come together. Having a three way agreement is in no way about setting standards for parenting but a suggestion of ways in which they can provide support for each other (and support sometimes looks a bit like challenge). I find it interesting that on the one hand some of these threads go on about a waste of resources. Why don't you think about the waste of energy you've expended going on about it and how you could have used it positively to help your kids!

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm pleased to come from a family with three

> generations of teachers on both sides of the

> state/private divide. We lived, ate and breathed

> education.

>

> It wasn't the leaflet that raised my eyebrows, and

> that's why I didn't mention it.

>

> I can assure you from a well informed position

> that the inability for some parents to recognise

> that education is a three way contract between the

> child, the parents and the school is one of the

> biggest problems facing our education system.



I can assure you Huguenot that many people put an awful lot into supporting Goodrich School. I have been absolutley amazed by the time and effort some people are willing to put into organisation, fund raising and general school support at Goodrich.


I think these people deserve, 1) the school as a whole and 2) the Head specifically to be at least as dedicated as the parents in responding to the needs of local people, with the aim of providing a school that meets their expectations on all matters of teaching and communication.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You're forgetting that the Labour Administration under Blair - while not directly responsible for privatisation - actually reinforced the privatisation by changing their licences and basically cementing the agreement, ignoring warnings, failing to return the industry to the public sector, and there were in fact tenuous links of the Labour Administration to the private profit making sector. It's like saying the bathroom flooded because Thatcher turned the tap on - but not mentioning that Blair put the plug in and turned the tap on full    
    • I'm a review writer & am testing out gas BBQs this month, so in need of a 15kg propane bottle. Happy to return within the month if needed! 
    • Currently has some availability for local handyman jobs. 
    • It's taken time to see the legacy of Thatcher's free market policy but we're really seeing it now with utilities, housing and infrastructure 😢.  I think I've remembered correctly that on Dirty Business they said we are the only country in the world to have our water supply totally privately owned.   When it gets taken back into public ownership the private owners will rub their hands together with glee having withdrawn massive profits and bonuses over the last 30 + years, let the infrastructure go to pot and now have the taxpayer come back in after this long period of neglect and pay for the failing systems to be rebuilt.  If you think those companies will suffer at the hands of government then you have more faith than I.  Thatcherism has a lot to answer for ☹️  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...