Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Original post:

messageFeedback question?

Posted by DuckOfBorough Yesterday, 01:49PM


Hi, I've a question regarding feedback.

If for example if I've experienced bad services with a particular workman/company, which however have got 2 x positives feedback on here(but one of it is from himself), so what if my experiences is not a positive one, does this mean I wouldn't be allowed to leave a warning feedback?


answer on the postcard please.




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit was yesterday, 02:04pm by DuckOfBorough.


Options: Reply To This Message?Quote This Message?Reply via Private Message (PM)?Follow This Thread?Report This Message?Edit Post

messageRe: Feedback question?

Posted by peckham_ryu Yesterday, 02:09PM


Nothing wrong with balance.


Bonus points if you get into a public argument with the workman. Target to beat is probably Nailgate: [www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk]


Options: Reply To This Message?Quote This Message?Reply via Private Message (PM)?Follow This Thread?Report This Message

messageRe: Feedback question?

Posted by Administrator Yesterday, 02:25PM


Hi DuckOfBorough


You were banned this morning as Penfold7 because posted numerous times in different sections abut a particular builder. You are free to post about your experiences however you didn't, you just said you don't rate them, no details about your experience. So, assuming they're an East Dulwich company please feel free, let rip, share the facts, post about your experience in the business section.


--------------------

The Administrator

______________________

Help & FAQ's - Terms of use


Options: Reply To This Message?Quote This Message?Reply via Private Message (PM)?Follow This Thread?Report This Message

messageRe: Feedback question?

Posted by DuckOfBorough Today, 10:55AM


Yes, this is correct. Indeed, the message was rather polite with the name of the company/workman, 'I don't rate it' (This is a review itself no?) follow by 'email if you like more info'. This is actually a very polite, so I don't know what the problem is. So does this mean you have re posted the message? Also may I point out you've been happy to have this particular company/workman to false adversiting since mid 2016 (I didn't realise self advertising was allow on here now?) But my polite message was not exceptable. This is redicoulous. However re multi reposting, I did not know this was not allow. So am I allow to mention the name of this person and company?



My reply today:

Yes, this is correct. Indeed, the message was rather polite with the name of the company/workman, 'I don't rate it' (This is a review itself no?) follow by 'email if you like more info'. This is actually a very polite, so I don't know what the problem is. So does this mean you have re posted the message? Also may I point out you've been happy to have this particular company/workman to false adversiting since mid 2016 (I didn't realise self advertising was allow on here now?) But my polite message was not exceptable. This is redicoulous. However re multi reposting, I did not know this was not allow. So am I allow to mention the name of this person and company?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/140058-re-posting-feedback-question/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There seems to be a change in the reception staff - did not recognise a couple of them when I last visited.  Not sure whether one of the long term staff has retired as not seen her for a while.  Used on line facility as my podiatrist recommended antibiotics for a toe infection and also took photo of my toe which I attached yo my request. Got a message back within a day to say medication ordered from chemist. 
    • Alternatively, here's the whole caboodle. Reference    25/AP/1351 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new ATM with associated security camera and light. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference    25/AP/1352 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new louvre. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference   25/AP/1353 Display of 1 no. new non-illuminated box fascia with vinyl lettering, 1 no. new box fascia with internally illuminated acrylic lettering, 2 no. new non-illuminated box fascia, 2 no. new internally illuminated projecting signs and 1 no. new vinyl to be applied around ATM. 29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Advertisement Consent-GRANTED  Decided Mon 07 Jul 2025 The only Lordship Lane item I could find as granted in w/b 13 October was to do with replacement of Dulwich Library's heating system by an air heat pump. 
    • Oh give it a break.  We have an MP who makes racist comments, yet our media (and what seems like this Forum) that generally hate Labour (and loved Johnson) are just out looking for the dirt. It's a move on, nothing to see here.  Particularly if she used a letting agency.
    • Hi all, I highly recommend Rob Mills Gas Safe boiler engineer, helpful and knowledgeable. contact number 07952584171    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...