Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Original post:

messageFeedback question?

Posted by DuckOfBorough Yesterday, 01:49PM


Hi, I've a question regarding feedback.

If for example if I've experienced bad services with a particular workman/company, which however have got 2 x positives feedback on here(but one of it is from himself), so what if my experiences is not a positive one, does this mean I wouldn't be allowed to leave a warning feedback?


answer on the postcard please.




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit was yesterday, 02:04pm by DuckOfBorough.


Options: Reply To This Message?Quote This Message?Reply via Private Message (PM)?Follow This Thread?Report This Message?Edit Post

messageRe: Feedback question?

Posted by peckham_ryu Yesterday, 02:09PM


Nothing wrong with balance.


Bonus points if you get into a public argument with the workman. Target to beat is probably Nailgate: [www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk]


Options: Reply To This Message?Quote This Message?Reply via Private Message (PM)?Follow This Thread?Report This Message

messageRe: Feedback question?

Posted by Administrator Yesterday, 02:25PM


Hi DuckOfBorough


You were banned this morning as Penfold7 because posted numerous times in different sections abut a particular builder. You are free to post about your experiences however you didn't, you just said you don't rate them, no details about your experience. So, assuming they're an East Dulwich company please feel free, let rip, share the facts, post about your experience in the business section.


--------------------

The Administrator

______________________

Help & FAQ's - Terms of use


Options: Reply To This Message?Quote This Message?Reply via Private Message (PM)?Follow This Thread?Report This Message

messageRe: Feedback question?

Posted by DuckOfBorough Today, 10:55AM


Yes, this is correct. Indeed, the message was rather polite with the name of the company/workman, 'I don't rate it' (This is a review itself no?) follow by 'email if you like more info'. This is actually a very polite, so I don't know what the problem is. So does this mean you have re posted the message? Also may I point out you've been happy to have this particular company/workman to false adversiting since mid 2016 (I didn't realise self advertising was allow on here now?) But my polite message was not exceptable. This is redicoulous. However re multi reposting, I did not know this was not allow. So am I allow to mention the name of this person and company?



My reply today:

Yes, this is correct. Indeed, the message was rather polite with the name of the company/workman, 'I don't rate it' (This is a review itself no?) follow by 'email if you like more info'. This is actually a very polite, so I don't know what the problem is. So does this mean you have re posted the message? Also may I point out you've been happy to have this particular company/workman to false adversiting since mid 2016 (I didn't realise self advertising was allow on here now?) But my polite message was not exceptable. This is redicoulous. However re multi reposting, I did not know this was not allow. So am I allow to mention the name of this person and company?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/140058-re-posting-feedback-question/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thankyou so so much tam. Your def a at angle. I was so so worried. Your a good man, we need more like your good self in the world.  Thankyou for the bottom of my heart. Pepper is pleased to be back
    • I have your cat , she’s fine , you can phone me on 07883 065 076 , I’m still up and can bring her to you now (1.15 AM Sunday) if not tonight then tomorrow afternoon or evening ? I’ve DM’d you in here as well 
    • This week's edition of The Briefing Room I found really useful and impressively informative on the training aspect.  David Aaronovitch has come a long way since his University Challenge day. 😉  It's available to hear online or download as mp3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002n7wv In a few days time resident doctors -who used to be known as junior doctors - were meant to be going on strike. This would be the 14th strike by the doctors’ union since March 2023. The ostensible reason was pay but now the dispute may be over without more increases to salary levels. The Government has instead made an offer to do something about the other big issue for early career doctors - working conditions and specialist training places. David Aaronovitch and guests discuss what's going on and ask what the problem is with the way we in Britain train our doctors? Guests: Hugh Pym, BBC Health Editor Sir Andrew Goddard, Consultant Gastroenterologist Professor Martin McKee, Professor of European Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Mark Dayan, Policy Analyst, Nuffield Trust. Presenter: David Aaronovitch Producers: Caroline Bayley, Kirsteen Knight, Cordelia Hemming Production Co-ordinator: Maria Ogundele Sound Engineers: Michael Regaard, Gareth Jones Editor: Richard Vadon  
    • That was one that the BBC seem to have lost track of.  But they do still have quite a few. These are some in their 60s archive. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0028zp6
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...