Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Pulling out of Sylvester Rd onto Barry Rd to go South is a potential killer for me, I did it recently a few times at 06.15am and variable found myself in the path of a car, or in one case a no. 12 bendy bus,

The issue was that cars park close to the junction making you blind when pulling out. It was literally a game of roulette.

After finding myself 30ft in front of a no. 12 I changed my route.

The speed of the oncoming vehicle would gave meant a harder impact but the root fault at that spot was lack of VISIBILITY.

I agree. No amount of expensive raised block paving will cure that. I could solve this junction's issues with two cans of yellow industrial road marking spray and a big roll of masking tape. Cost the council tax payer about ?15.

Hi tiddles,

No changes to the current kerb line - the plans show the current kerb line its just the raising of th road at these points to meet the kerb height.


Hi Penguin68 & EDOliver,

We reviewed this junction and contrasted it with Barry Road/Upland Road junction which has had zero reported collissions versus Underhill/Barry Road 8 over the previous three years.

The idea is to copy the success of the zero collission junction.

You may be right on the impact of the changes but we have a hugely successful example in what appears very similar circumstance and copying it should resolve this collission hotspot. The one fly in the ointment is also getting a stop sign as per the UPland/Barry road junction.


Hi KidKruger,

Sounds a frigtful experience.

The junction of Silvester with Barry Road has no reported collissions over the previous three years. Hard to work on impriving such a juncton when we've yet to exhaustively fix other junction with reported collissions.

The Upland/Barry Rd junction is completely different.


a) there isn't nearly as much traffic going across it. Upland north of Barry Rd doesn't really go anywhere (Henslowe which only takes you back to Underhill) or round pas the school and back onto Peckham Rye, so its not often used in that direction. Equally going south you only have traffic coming round from Peckham Rye (Henslowe is one way, not exiting from that end), which just goes straight on down there instead of across the junction.


b) the barry Rd through traffic is already slowing down/not got up much speed because its near the end of Barry Rd, all the buses stop just past either side of the junction, and the traffic lights by the off licence are used much more frequently.


Its not a like for like comparison in any sense.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Pulling out of Sylvester Rd onto Barry Rd to go

> South is a potential killer for me, I did it

> recently a few times at 06.15am and variable found

> myself in the path of a car, or in one case a no.

> 12 bendy bus,

> The issue was that cars park close to the junction

> making you blind when pulling out. It was

> literally a game of roulette.

> After finding myself 30ft in front of a no. 12 I

> changed my route.

> The speed of the oncoming vehicle would gave meant

> a harder impact but the root fault at that spot

> was lack of VISIBILITY.


Yes, I've had problems at this junction too - end up inching out veeery slowly. Cars are allowed to park far too close to the junction for you to be able to see past them to approaching traffic. I actually find this one more nerve wracking than the one with Underhill although I agree that one is an issue too.

Hi Mellors,

That's what I thouht but it used to have collissions before the current set-up.

Frankly nearly everything in the traffic council officers armoury is being thrown at this junction after everything considered during a long meeting on site.

Lets get these two entry treatments. Try for the STOP signs. See what happens. I'm hopeful it will do the trick and can then concentrate on other collissions sites.

  • 3 weeks later...

The Underhill Road/Barry Road junction improvements will take place starting 4 April and take five weeks.


Effectively each side of this junction will have what is called an entry treatment where the road is raised to the level of pavement. These 'vertical deflection' each side of Barry Road on Underhill Road slowing vehicles down and this is expected to drastically reduce the frequency and severity of collisions.


So from Friday 8 April this junction should be signififcantly safer.


The final part of the jugsaw will then be changing the Give way to stop signs...

Mr Barber. Since I've been going on about Barry Road for years, ever since someone woke us in the middle of the night having crashed into Barry's shop, I must applaud you for the work you have done and am greatly gladenned to hear of this development. It really is a shame you're a Liberal and will soon be extinct. You have time to defect and maybe continue on your political journey. All the best. TQ

Can I just add (not sure if it has been raised before in thsi thread) that the automatic sign that indicates to cars that they are speeding as they go up Barry Road is not working (it is near the bottom on the left as you go up, almost opposite Barry's minimart).


I am sure it had an effect on speeding cars as they zoomed up the road....Is it going to be fixed? To whom should I report it?

Hi treehugger,

Could you please report it to me ideally with the lamp post number or precise location so that council contractros can quickly find it.

Their is a type of this sign that is no longer maintained. But council officers will be able to tell us that once inspected. If it is one of the defunct types I'll ask for it to be removed.

Five weeks! What are they planning on doing here? Building and under and over pass?


I guess I should be happy that something is going to be done about this, but on the other hand, I can just imagine the nightmare this junction, and Barry road is going to be with the remedial work taking this long, and the building work that is being undertaken at the old timber yard, with various concrete trucks and lorry deliveries.


Oh, good grief.


Thanks to James though, for finally getting some council action on this junction.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
    • I always like Redemptions coffee though I've not visted for awhile..Romeo Jones was always my 1st choice for takeout Coffee Redemption 2nd. What IS with all these independent Yoga and Pilates Studios? Theres one on London Rd in Forest Hill (Mind) thats recently opened and then theres the Pilates place thats opened on North X Road. I looked at the prices of the one on NorthX road and was frankly shocked at how expensive it is, The FH one is slightly less.  Made me decide to stick with classes in The local authority gym
    • Dulwich Village update: The old DVillage location is (again?) under offer. The storefront next to the new grocer is going to open as a yoga and pilates studio...the name of which I've forgotten. 🤦‍♂️  Megan's is starting to push its takeaway coffee and cannibalise some of Redemption Coffee's market share. Is Megan's struggling? It's quite a big restaurant they have and rent cant be cheap. The reinventing of the Megan's branch on Lordship Lane as Ollie's seems to have stalled. And Redemption is looking a bit tired these days...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...