Jump to content

Warm and friendly nanny required - April start


Dot81

Recommended Posts

Hello,


We are looking for a fun-loving and caring nanny 4.5 days per week, ideally to start in April. We are two families with a boy and girl of the same age (currently 18 months old). The job will be based in one house only in East Dulwich, just off Lordship Lane. This could be a live-out or live-in (during the week only) position.


We are looking for an outgoing, kind and reliable nanny with experience of caring for two children at the same time. You should be passionate about working with children and enjoy doing fun activities with them, both at home and at group classes.


Fluent Spanish language skills would be highly desirable but not essential.


Key responsibilities will include:


- provide care 4.5 days a week from 7.30am to 7pm (with flexibility to work later on occasions)

- cook nutritious and well-balanced meals for the children

- all childcare-related duties e.g. washing clothes, tidying-up each day etc


Essential requirements include:


- a valid CRB check

- e a valid First Aid certification

- provide at least 2 recent references


If you feel you are the right nanny for us, please send us your CV and a covering email/letter including your references (referees will not be contacted until after an interview and with your permission).


We look forward to hearing from you.

Good afternoon,

My name is Sarah and I live locally in Forest Hill. I am looking for a full time nannying position and can start work in April. I currently work full time in a nursery and have experience with children aged 4 months to 4 years. I have a clear DBS and I am also first aid qualified.

I look forward to hearing from you and any questions you have.

Sarah

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...