Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was recently ticketed on Upland Road at 10am on a Thursday for having the wheels of my car touching the paving stones of a cut curb. "No room for pedestrians" except the picture clearly showed room and I measured 2 meters and more of room stopping no one from a straight-line perambulation down the pavement. The Parking Control Car must have been having a quiet break after the Goodrich School start of day and then looking to justify an hour with no tickets saw my car as an entry in their log book.

I understand the law of tyres and curbs but I think Parking Officers should be on the High Street keeping traffic moving. Southwark is looking to cut 80 million from its costs. I think one item should be how parking is policed. I think it is subjective and not transparent now. I think areas to be controlled should be monitored with pay-to-park and residential streets should be off limits when there is nothing extraordinary that requires the attention of a Parking Official.

Comments?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/14300-parking-and-parking-enforcement/
Share on other sites

All parking "police" now seem to have digital cameras - if they took a photo of every alleged infringement this would allow cases such as yours to be appealed.


I was once ticketed for a wrongful turn - the attached photo showed my car to be in Rye Lane at the time I was supposed to have been making an illegal left turn. Result - an abandoned ticketing process and no fine.

Not parking across dropped curbs isn't subjective, it's objective. You either were or you weren't.


What you're actually doing is asking parking enforcement officials to take a subjective view, and let you off on the basis that granny can squeeze past.


I think chaos would be the final outcome in that situation. My advice is to stick to the rules and don't park across dropped curbs.


If that's too difficult, then sell the car.

I have appealed but the response in beauro-speak was the law: wheels make not over-lap stone even on a cut cut and pavements must be kept clear. Fair enough. The point I made was that on a curb cut I obstructed nothing. In the picture (yes they took one) it is clear and I have measured: the available pavement remained complete 2 metres and even more. The point I am making is that the authority for petty fines, grey areas and ticket padding is unchecked. This was a residential street at 10 am. I was in fact standing on the street doing something a bit further on. The Officers had hung about for a full hour after school start and then looked for someone to ticket. I saw the law is an ass.

Where are you getting this 2m figure from? There's no rule that says you can park across dropped curbs so long as there's a 2m gap.


The point about parking across dopped curbs is that there is no grey area - you can't park across them.


What you're proposing is that you can ignore the laws that you don't find convenient. Mayhem.

Honest question - we live on Friern Road and have a driveway, dropped curb and white line. I always tell my friends to park in front of our driveway as it's so difficult to park on our road. Can they actually be done for this although it's in front of our driveway - ie private? I'm thinking the answer is yes but wanted to confirm and see whether anyone else in this road/area have had tickets with people parking in front of their driveway?

It's simply a stealth tax. Local authorities are liberal with parking tickets and many are issued unlawfully, in the knowledge that most motorists won't contest. And as pressure on local govt spending increases, so the volume of parking fines issued will increase.


The simple solution is not to break the rules.

pebbles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Honest question - we live on Friern Road and have

> a driveway, dropped curb and white line. I always

> tell my friends to park in front of our driveway

> as it's so difficult to park on our road. Can they

> actually be done for this although it's in front

> of our driveway - ie private? I'm thinking the

> answer is yes but wanted to confirm and see

> whether anyone else in this road/area have had

> tickets with people parking in front of their

> driveway?


Here is your answer: http://forums.pepipoo.com/lofiversion/index.php/t37577.html


86 Prohibition of parking at dropped footways etc


(3) The second exception is where the vehicle is parked outside residential premises by or with the consent (but not consent given for reward) of the occupier of the premises.


This exception does not apply in the case of a shared driveway.



I would copy and paste this for any appeals!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...